Home < 科学研究 < 文章摘要 < 急性冠脉综合征 < 

急性冠脉综合征

Review Article

2018 Apr 7;20(5):41.

JOURNAL:Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med.

Complete Versus Culprit-Only Revascularization in STEMI: a Contemporary Review

Lu DY, Zhong M, Feldman DN.

10432

Keywords: Coronary artery disease; Myocardial infarction; ST-segment elevation; STEMI

ABSTRACT


PURPOSE OF REVIEW In ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, urgent revascularization of the culprit coronary vessel and restoration of coronary flow is the goal of the initial management. However, obstructive non-culprit disease is frequently concomitantly found during initial angiography and portends a poor prognosis. Management of non-culprit lesions in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has been the subject of extensive debate. This review will examine the currently available evidence, with a specific focus on randomized clinical trials performed to date.


RECENT FINDINGSAlthough early observational data suggested better outcomes with culprit-only revascularization, more recent data from several randomized trials have suggested improved outcomes with complete multivessel revascularization, either during the index PCI procedure or as a staged procedure. Data from recent randomized controlled trials have suggested the superiority of complete or multivessel revascularization and have subsequently led to changes to the most recent iterations of STEMI guidelines. However, the optimal management and timing of revascularization of non-culprit lesions in STEMI remain controversial.