CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
English

左主干支架

科研文章

荐读文献

Left-main restenosis in the DES era-a call for action Current Interventions for the Left Main Bifurcation One or two stents for the distal Left Main bifurcation The DK crush V study - The DK crush V study Comparison of double kissing crush versus Culotte stenting for unprotected distal left main bifurcation lesions: results from a multicenter, randomized, prospective DKCRUSH-III study Double Kissing Crush Versus Provisional Stenting for Left Main Distal Bifurcation Lesions: DKCRUSH-V Randomized Trial Design and rationale for the treatment effects of provisional side branch stenting and DK crush stenting techniques in patients with unprotected distal left main coronary artery bifurcation lesions (DKCRUSH V) Trial Left Main Revascularization in 2017 Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting or Percutaneous Coronary Intervention? Stent fracture is associated with a higher mortality in patients with type-2 diabetes treated by implantation of a second-generation drug-eluting stent Usefulness of the SYNTAX score II to validate 2-year outcomes in patients with complex coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A large single-center study Contemporary Approach to Coronary Bifurcation Lesion Treatment

Clinical Trial12 Sep 2017, [Epub ahead of print]

JOURNAL:Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. Article Link

Usefulness of the SYNTAX score II to validate 2-year outcomes in patients with complex coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A large single-center study

Song Y, Gao Z, Tang X et al. Keywords: complex PCI; left main coronary disease; percutaneous coronary intervention; risk stratification

ABSTRACT

Objective - This study aimed to assess the prognostic ability of synergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with Taxus and cardiac surgery score II (SS-II) in a large cohort of patients with complex coronary artery disease (CAD) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in clinical practice.


Background - Few studies have explored the usefulness of SS-II in nonrandomized clinical patients with complex CAD undergoing temporary PCI.


Methods - We prospectively enrolled 4398 consecutive patients undergoing three-vessel and/or unprotected left main PCI in a single center from January 2013 to December 2013. Patients were stratified according to SS-II for PCI tertiles as follows: SS-II ≤ 20 (n = 1474); SS-II 20-26 (n = 1462); and SS-II > 26 (n = 1462). The predictive ability for 2-year mortality was compared between angiographic scores and scores combining both angiographic and clinical variables.


Results - Mortality was significantly higher in the upper tertile than in the intermediate or lower tertiles during the 2-year follow-up (2.7% vs 1.7% vs 0.5%, respectively; P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that SS-II was an independent predictor of 2-year mortality (hazard ratio: 1.66, 95% confidence interval: 1.03-2.68; P = 0.04). After adjusting for multivariable factors, SS-II had better prediction of 2-year mortality than baseline SS (C-index: SS-II = 0.740 vs baseline SS = 0.620; P < 0.001).


Conclusions - As a risk score combining both anatomical and clinical variables, SS-II demonstrated superiority compared with the purely angiographic SS to predict 2-year mortality in a clinical population of patients with severe CAD undergoing temporary PCI.