CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
中 文

Drug Coated Balloon

Abstract

Recommended Article

Optical Coherence Tomography Predictors for Recurrent Restenosis After Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Angioplasty for Drug-Eluting Stent Restenosis Therapeutic Options for In-Stent Restenosis Clinical and angiographic outcomes of coronary dissection after paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty for small vessel coronary artery disease Treatment strategies for coronary in-stent restenosis: systematic review and hierarchical Bayesian network meta-analysis of 24 randomised trials and 4880 patients Comparison of drug-eluting stents and drug-coated balloon for the treatment of drug-eluting coronary stent restenosis: A randomized RESTORE trial Drug-Coated Balloon Versus Drug-Eluting Stent in Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Feasibility Study Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Angioplasty Versus Drug-Eluting Stent in Acute Myocardial Infarction: The REVELATION Randomized Trial Drug-Coated Balloon Versus Drug-Eluting Stent for Small-Vessel Disease: The RESTORE SVD China Randomized Trial
|<< 1 2 3 4 5 6 >>|

Review Article2018 Oct;30(10):360-366.

JOURNAL：J Invasive Cardiol. Article Link

Treatment of Drug-Eluting Stent In-Stent Restenosis With Drug-Eluting Balloons: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Liu S, Worme M, Bagai A et al. Keywords: ISR; drug-eluting balloon; drug-eluting stent; in-stent restenosis

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE - To evaluate the efficacy of drug-coated balloon (DEB) for the treatment of drug-eluting stent (DES) in-stent restenosis (ISR).


METHODS - A comprehensive literature search was performed. The primary outcome was the composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI), and target-lesion revascularization (TLR) at longest available follow-up (range, 12-36 months). Outcomes for DEB vs balloon angioplasty (BA) and DEB vs DES were analyzed separately using a random-effect Mantel-Haenszel model, as per an a priori protocol.

 

RESULTS - The study cohort comprised 1526 patients (746 DEB, 537 DES, 243 BA). DEB was associated with lower composite outcome compared with BA alone (19% vs 47%; risk ratio [RR], 0.31; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.11-0.84; P=.02), driven primarily by lower TLR (17% vs 34%; RR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.46-0.95; P=.03), with no difference in death or MI. There was no difference in the composite outcome between DEB and DES (20% vs 17%; RR, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.82-1.74; P=.35); DEB was associated with higher TLR (17.4% vs 11.3%; RR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.08-2.03; P=.01), but lower all-cause mortality (2.2% vs 5.7%; RR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.22-0.82; P=.01), with no difference in MI or stent thrombosis.

 

CONCLUSIONS - DEB was associated with a lower TLR rate than BA alone, but associated with a higher TLR rate than implantation of another DES. However, additional DES use was associated with an increase in mortality, a finding that requires further investigation.

>CBS CBS 2019

> CBS 2019 REGISTRATION

> CBS 2019 PROGRAM

> CBS 2019 CALL FOR SCIENCE

> CBS 2019 SPOTLIGHTS

 CBSMD

> CBSMD WEBSITE REGISTRATION

> EDUCATION CENTER

> RECOMMANDED PAPER

> TOP 10 RESEARCH PAPER

> PRE-READING

CBS 2019 CBS 2019 FACULTY Education Resource CBSMD Scientific Library
Copyright ⓒ CBS MD Nanjing China. All rights reserved. 京ICP备16025898号-11
联系我们| Top