CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
中 文

Optical Coherence Tomography

Abstract

Recommended Article

Optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound to evaluate coronary artery disease and percutaneous coronary intervention Optical coherence tomography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segmentelevation myocardial infarction: a prospective propensity-matched cohort of the thrombectomy versus percutaneous coronary intervention alone trial OCT compared with IVUS in a coronary lesion assessment: the OPUS-CLASS study Myocardial Blood Flow and Coronary Flow Reserve During 3 Years Following Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold Versus Metallic Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation: The VANISH Trial Intravascular optical coherence tomography Optical coherence tomography predictors of target vessel myocardial infarction after provisional stenting in patients with coronary bifurcation disease Covering our tracks – optical coherence tomography to assess vascular healing Treatment of calcified coronary lesions with Palmaz-Schatz stents. An intravascular ultrasound study

Review Article2017 Dec 26;10(24):2473-2487.

JOURNAL:JACC Cardiovasc Interv. Article Link

Intracoronary Optical Coherence Tomography 2018: Current Status and Future Directions

Ali ZA, Karimi Galougahi K, Maehara A et al. Keywords: IVUS; OCT; PCI; angioplasty; drug-eluting stent(s); intravascular imaging

ABSTRACT

The advent of intravascular imaging has been a significant advancement in visualization of coronary arteries, particularly with optical coherence tomography (OCT) that allows for high-resolution imaging of intraluminal and transmural coronary structures. Accumulating data support a clinical role for OCT in a multitude of clinical scenarios, including assessing the natural history of atherosclerosis and modulating effects of therapies, mechanisms of acute coronary syndromes, mechanistic insights into the effects of novel interventional devices, and optimization of percutaneous coronary intervention. In this state-of-the-art review, we provide an overview of the published data on the clinical utility of OCT, highlighting the areas that need further investigation and the current barriers for further adoption of OCT in interventional cardiology practice.