CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
中 文

Rotational Atherectomy

Abstract

Recommended Article

Pivotal trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the orbital atherectomy system in treating de novo, severely calcified coronary lesions (ORBIT II) Long-term clinical outcomes of permanent polymer everolimus-eluting stent implantation following rotational atherectomy for severely calcified de novo coronary lesions: Results of a 22-center study (Tokyo-MD PCI Study) Trends in Utilization of, and Comparative Safety and Effectiveness of Orbital and Rotational Atherectomy Orbital atherectomy for treating de novo, severely calcified coronary lesions: 3-year results of the pivotal ORBIT II trial Utilizing intravascular ultrasound imaging prior to treatment of severely calcified coronary lesions with orbital atherectomy: An ORBIT II sub-analysis
|<< 1 2 3 4 5 >>|

Original Research2017 Dec;10(12).

JOURNAL：Circ Cardiovasc Interv. Article Link

Radial Versus Femoral Access for Rotational Atherectomy: A UK Observational Study of 8622 Patients

Watt J, Austin D, Mackay D et al. Keywords: access site; atherectomy; hemorrhage; radial artery

ABSTRACT


BACKGROUND - Rotational atherectomy (RA) is an important interventional tool for heavily calcified coronary lesions. We compared the early clinical outcomes in patients undergoing RA using radial or femoral access.


METHODS AND RESULTS - We identified all patients in England and Wales who underwent RA between January 1, 2005, and March 31, 2014. Eight thousand six hundred twenty-two RA cases (3069 radial and 5553 femoral) were included in the analysis. The study primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Propensity scores were calculated to determine the factors associated with treatment assignment to radial or femoral access. Multivariable logistic regression analysis, using the calculated propensity scores, was performed. Thirty-day mortality was 2.2% in the radial and 2.3% in the femoral group (P=0.76). Radial access was associated with equivalent 30-day mortality (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77-1.46; P=0.71), procedural success (OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.84-1.29; P=0.73), major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.80-1.38; P=0.72), and net adverse clinical events (OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.71-1.15; P=0.41), but lower rates of in-hospital major bleeding (OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.40-0.98; P=0.04) and major access site complications (OR, 0.05; 95% CI, 0.01-0.38; P=0.004), compared with femoral access.


CONCLUSIONS - In this large real-world study of patients undergoing RA, radial access was associated with equivalent 30-day mortality and procedural success, but reduced major bleeding and access site complications, compared with femoral access.


© 2017 American Heart Association, Inc.

>CBS CBS 2019

> CBS 2019 REGISTRATION

> CBS 2019 PROGRAM

> CBS 2019 CALL FOR SCIENCE

> CBS 2019 SPOTLIGHTS

 CBSMD

> CBSMD WEBSITE REGISTRATION

> EDUCATION CENTER

> RECOMMANDED PAPER

> TOP 10 RESEARCH PAPER

> PRE-READING

CBS 2019 CBS 2019 FACULTY Education Resource CBSMD Scientific Library
Copyright ⓒ CBS MD Nanjing China. All rights reserved. 京ICP备16025898号-11
联系我们| Top