CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
中 文

Bifurcation Stenting

Abstract

Recommended Article

Step-by-step manual for planning and performing bifurcation PCI: a resource-tailored approach Classification and treatment of coronary artery bifurcation lesions: putting the Medina classification to the test Long-term outcomes of routine versus provisional T-stenting for de novo coronary bifurcation lesions: five-year results of the Bifurcations Bad Krozingen I study A randomized trial of a dedicated bifurcation stent versus provisional stenting in the treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions Optimal Strategy for Provisional Side Branch Intervention in Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: 3-Year Outcomes of the SMART-STRATEGY Randomized Trial Clinical Outcome of Double Kissing Crush Versus Provisional Stenting of Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions: The 5-Year Follow-Up Results From a Randomized and Multicenter DKCRUSH-II Study (Randomized Study on Double Kissing Crush Technique Versus Provisional Stenting Technique for Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions) Impact of bifurcation technique on 2-year clinical outcomes in 773 patients with distal unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis treated with drug-eluting stents Percutaneous coronary intervention for bifurcation coronary lesions: the 15th consensus document from the European Bifurcation Club

ConsensusOctober 2020

JOURNAL:Eurointervention. Article Link

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention For Bifurcation Coronary Lesions.The 15th Consensus Document from the European Bifurcation Club

F Burzotta; JF Lassen; T Lefèvre et al. Keywords: EBC; consensus; bifurcation stenting

ABSTRACT

The 15th European Bifurcation Club (EBC) meeting was held in Barcelona in October 2019 and it facilitated a renewed consensus on coronary bifurcation lesions (CBL) and unprotected left main (LM) percutaneous interventions.


Bifurcation stenting techniques continue to be refined, developed and tested. It remains evident that provisional approach with optional side-branch treatment utilising T, T and small protrusion (TAP) or culotte continue to provide flexible options for the majority of CBL patients. Debate persists regarding the optimal treatment of side branches, including assessment of clinical significance and thresholds for bail-out treatment. In more complex CBL, especially when involving the LM, adoption of dedicated 2-stent techniques should be considered. Operators using such techniques have to be fully familiar with their procedural steps and should acknowledge associated limitations and challenges. When using 2-stent techniques, failure to perform a final kissing inflation is regarded as a technical failure, since it may jeopardize clinical outcome.


The development of novel technical tools and drug regimens deserve attention. In particular, intra-coronary imaging, bifurcation simulation, drug-eluting balloon technology and tailored anti-platelet therapy are identified as promising tools to enhance clinical outcomes.


In conclusion, the evolution of a broad spectrum of bifurcation PCI components have resulted from studies extending from bench testing to randomised controlled trials. However, further advances are still needed to achieve the ambitious goal of optimizing the clinical outcomes for every patient undergoing PCI on a CBL.