CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
中 文

二尖瓣/三尖瓣瓣膜

Abstract

Recommended Article

New Evidence Supporting a Novel Conceptual Framework for Distinguishing Proportionate and Disproportionate Functional Mitral Regurgitation Adaptive development of concomitant secondary mitral and tricuspid regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement Percutaneous Repair or Medical Treatment for Secondary Mitral Regurgitation: Outcomes at 2 years Patient and Hospital Characteristics of Mitral Valve Surgery in the United States Association Between Malignant Mitral Valve Prolapse and Sudden Cardiac Death: A Review Thrombotic Risk and Antithrombotic Strategies After Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement Initial experience with percutaneous mitral valve repair in patients with cardiac amyloidosis Transcatheter Interventions for Mitral Regurgitation: Multimodality Imaging for Patient Selection and Procedural Guidance

Clinical TrialSeptember 2019

JOURNAL:J Am Coll Cardiol. Article Link

Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement in Patients with Heart Failure and Secondary Mitral Regurgitation: From COAPT Trial

FM Asch, PA Grayburn, the COAPT Investigators. Keywords: secondary mitral regurgitation; heart failure; percutaneous mitral valve repair; mitral valve edge-to-edge repair; MitraClip;echocardiography; clinical outcomes

ABSTRACT


BACKGROUND- In the COAPT trial among patients with heart failure (HF) and moderate-to-severe (3+) or severe (4+) secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR), patients treated with the transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) had reduced rates of HF hospitalization and mortality compared with guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) alone.

 

OBJECTIVES- To describe the echocardiographic patient qualification process for COAPT, baseline echocardiographic characteristics, changes over time, and the interaction between treatment group and echocardiographic parameters on clinical outcomes.

 

METHODS- A novel echocardiographic algorithm was implemented for grading MR severity during the screening process. Standardized echocardiograms were obtained at baseline and during regular follow-up intervals through 2 years, and analyzed by a core laboratory.

 

RESULTS- A total of 614 patients were randomized to TMVR plus maximally- tolerated GDMT or GDMT alone. Mean baseline left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 31.3±9.3%, LV end-diastolic volume was 192.7±71 ml, and effective regurgitant orifice area was 0.41±0.15 cm2. The beneficial effect of TMVR compared with GDMT alone was consistent in all echocardiographic subgroups, independent of the severity of LV dysfunction, LV dilatation, pulmonary hypertension, severity of tricuspid regurgitation or individual MR characteristics. The LVEF decreased and the LV volumes progressively increased in both groups during follow-up, although less after TMVR (P<0.05).

 

CONCLUSIONS- HF patients in the COAPT trial with 3+ or 4+ SMR, selected using strict echocardiographic criteria, benefitted from TMVR with reduced 2-year rates of death and HF hospitalization. Strict application of these echocardiographic criteria should enable the COAPT results to be translated to clinical practice.