CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
中 文

Mitral/Tricuspid Valvular Disease

Abstract

Recommended Article

Combined Tricuspid and Mitral Versus Isolated Mitral Valve Repair for Severe MR and TR: An Analysis From the TriValve and TRAMI Registries Adaptive development of concomitant secondary mitral and tricuspid regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement Association Between Malignant Mitral Valve Prolapse and Sudden Cardiac Death: A Review MITRA-FR vs. COAPT: Lessons from two trials with diametrically opposed results Closure of Iatrogenic Atrial Septal Defect Following Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair: The Randomized MITHRAS Trial Surgery Does Not Improve Survival in Patients With Isolated Severe Tricuspid Regurgitation Attenuated Mitral Leaflet Enlargement Contributes to Functional Mitral Regurgitation After Myocardial Infarction Outcomes of TTVI in Patients With Pacemaker or Defibrillator Leads: Data From the TriValve Registry

Clinical Trial2021 Mar, 77 (8) 1029–1040

JOURNAL:J Am Coll Cardiol. Article Link

3-Year Outcomes of Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair in Patients With Heart Failure

MJ Mack , J Lindenfeld, and for the COAPT Investigators et al.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND - In the COAPT (Cardiovascular Outcomes Assessment of the MitraClip Percutaneous Therapy for Heart Failure Patients with Functional Mitral Regurgitation) trial, transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVr) resulted in fewer heart failure hospitalizations (HFHs) and lower mortality at 24 months in patients with heart failure (HF) with mitral regurgitation (MR) secondary to left ventricular dysfunction compared with guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) alone.

 

OBJECTIVES - This study determined if these benefits persisted to 36 months and if control subjects who were allowed to cross over at 24 months derived similar benefit.

 

METHODS - This study randomized 614 patients with HF with moderate-to-severe or severe secondary MR, who remained symptomatic despite maximally tolerated GDMT, to TMVr plus GDMT versus GDMT alone. The primary effectiveness endpoint was all HFHs through 24-month follow-up. Patients have now been followed for 36 months.

 

RESULTS - The annualized rates of HFHs per patient-year were 35.5% with TMVr and 68.8% with GDMT alone (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.49; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.37 to 0.63; p < 0.001; number needed to treat (NNT) = 3.0; 95% CI: 2.4 to 4.0). Mortality occurred in 42.8% of the device group versus 55.5% of control group (HR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.52 to 0.85; p = 0.001; NNT = 7.9; 95% CI: 4.6 to 26.1). Patients who underwent TMVr also had sustained 3-year improvements in MR severity, quality-of-life measures, and functional capacity. Among 58 patients assigned to GDMT alone who crossed over and were treated with TMVr, the subsequent composite rate of mortality or HFH was reduced compared with those who continued on GDMT alone (adjusted HR: 0.43; 95% CI: 0.24 to 0.78; p = 0.006).

 

CONCLUSIONS - Among patients with HF and moderate-to-severe or severe secondary MR who remained symptomatic despite GDMT, TMVr was safe, provided a durable reduction in MR, reduced the rate of HFH, and improved survival, quality of life, and functional capacity compared with GDMT alone through 36 months. Surviving patients who crossed over to device treatment had a prognosis comparable to those originally assigned to transcatheter therapy. (Cardiovascular Outcomes Assessment of the MitraClip Percutaneous Therapy for Heart Failure Patients with Functional Mitral Regurgitation [COAPT]; NCT01626079)