CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
English

推荐文献

科研文章

荐读文献

Randomized Comparison Between Radial and Femoral Large-Bore Access for Complex Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Transcatheter Mitral-Valve Repair in Patients with Heart Failure Optimal Stenting Technique for Complex Coronary Lesions Intracoronary Imaging-Guided Pre-Dilation, Stent Sizing, and Post-Dilation Treatment of higher-risk patients with an indication for revascularization: evolution within the field of contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention A VOYAGER Meta-Analysis of the Impact of Statin Therapy on Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Triglyceride Levels in Patients With Hypertriglyceridemia Qualitative Methodology in Cardiovascular Outcomes Research: A Contemporary Look Efficacy and safety of rosuvastatin vs. atorvastatin in lowering LDL cholesterol : A meta-analysis of trials with East Asian populations Individualizing Revascularization Strategy for Diabetic Patients With Multivessel Coronary Disease Overall and Cause-Specific Mortality in Randomized Clinical Trials Comparing Percutaneous Interventions With Coronary Bypass Surgery: A Meta-analysis ACCF/SCAI/STS/AATS/AHA/ASNC 2009 Appropriateness Criteria for Coronary Revascularization: A Report by the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriateness Criteria Task Force, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association, and the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology Endorsed by the American Society of Echocardiography, the Heart Failure Society of America, and the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography

Original Research2018 Nov 1. pii: S0735-1097(18)38994-0.

JOURNAL:J Am Coll Cardiol. Article Link

Long-term Survival following Multivessel Revascularization in Patients with Diabetes (FREEDOM Follow-On Study)

Farkouh ME, Domanski M, FREEDOM Follow-On study investigators. Keywords: coronary artery disease; coronary revascularization; diabetes

ABSTRACT


BACKGROUND - The FREEDOM trial demonstrated that for patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and multivessel coronary disease (MVD), coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is superior to percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents (PCI-DES) in reducing the rate of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events after a median follow-up of 3.8 years. It is not known, however, whether CABG confers a survival benefit after an extended follow-up period.


OBJECTIVE - To evaluate the long-term survival of DM patients with MVD undergoing coronary revascularization in the FREEDOM trial.


METHODS - The FREEDOM trial randomized 1,900 patients with DM and MVD to undergo either PCI with sirolimus or paclitaxel eluting stents or CABG on a background of optimal medical therapy. After completion of the trial, enrolling centers and patients were invited to participate in the FREEDOM Follow-On study. Survival was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier analysis, and Cox proportional hazards models were used for subgroup and multivariate analyses.


RESULTS - Twenty-five centers (out of 140 original centers) agreed to participate in the FREEDOM Follow-On study and contributed a total of 943 patients (49.6% of the original cohort) with a median follow-up of 7.5 years (range, 0 to 13.2). Of the 1,900 patients, there were 314 deaths during the entire follow-up period (204 deaths in the original trial and 110 deaths in the FREEDOM Follow-On). The all-cause mortality rate was significantly higher in the PCI-DES group than in the CABG group (24.3% [159 deaths] vs. 18.3% [112 deaths]; hazard ratio[HR], 1.36; 95% confidence interval[CI], 1.07 to 1.74; p=0.01). Of the 943 patients with extended follow-up, all-cause mortality rate was 23.7% (99 deaths) in the PCI-DES group and 18.7% (72 deaths) in the CABG group (HR, 1.32; 95%CI, 0.97 to 1.78; p= 0.076).


CONCLUSIONS - In patients with DM and MVD, coronary revascularization with CABG leads to lower all-cause mortality than with PCI-DES in long-term follow-up.

 

Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.