CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
English

左主干支架

科研文章

荐读文献

Stroke Rates Following Surgical Versus Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization Design and rationale for a randomised comparison of everolimus-eluting stents and coronary artery bypass graft surgery in selected patients with left main coronary artery disease: the EXCEL trial Operator Experience and Outcomes After Left Main Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Long-term outcomes following mini-crush versus culotte stenting for the treatment of unprotected left main disease: insights from the Milan and New-Tokyo (MITO) registry Second vs. First generation drug eluting stents in multiple vessel disease and left main stenosis: Two-year follow-up of the observational, prospective, controlled, and multicenter ERACI IV registry Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients With Left Main and Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: Do We Have the Evidence? Percutaneous Coronary Intervention vs Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients With Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Long-term results after PCI of unprotected distal left main coronary artery stenosis: the Bifurcations Bad Krozingen (BBK)-Left Main Registry Two-year outcomes following unprotected left main stenting with first vs new-generation drug-eluting stents: the FINE registry. EuroIntervention. Differential prognostic impact of treatment strategy among patients with left main versus non-left main bifurcation lesions undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: results from the COBIS (Coronary Bifurcation Stenting) Registry II
|<< 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ...>>|

Editorial2018 Jul;28(5):365-366.

JOURNAL：Trends Cardiovasc Med. Article Link

Novel developments in revascularization for left main coronary artery disease

Carreras ET, Bhatt DL. Keywords: DK CRUSH; LM bifurcation lesions; evidence-based

Article Link

Please click on the "Article Link" on the right to get access to this article.


Quotation

"When PCI is used to treat LM bifurcation lesions,

DK-CRUSH is the most reasonable evidence-based approach."


>CBS CBS 2019

> CBS 2019

> CBS 2019 注册

> CBS 2019 会议日程

> CBS 2019 学术征集

> CBS 2019 热点

 CBSMD

> CBSMD 网站注册

> 教育中心

> 荐读文献

> Top 10 阅读文献

> 文献导读
CBS 2019 CBS 2019 主席团 教育中心 科研动态
Copyright ⓒ CBS MD Nanjing China. All rights reserved. 京ICP备16025898号-11
联系我们| Top