CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
English

左主干支架

科研文章

荐读文献

Left Main Stenting: What We Have Learnt So Far? 2-year outcomes with the Absorb bioresorbable scaffold for treatment of coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of seven randomised trials with an individual patient data substudy The Current State of Left Main Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Impact of different final optimization techniques on long-term clinical outcomes of left main cross-over stenting Bypass Surgery or Stenting for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease in Patients With Diabetes Novel developments in revascularization for left main coronary artery disease Outcomes After Left Main Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting According to Lesion Site Results From the EXCEL Trial Five-Year Outcomes after PCI or CABG for Left Main Coronary Disease Design and rationale for a randomised comparison of everolimus-eluting stents and coronary artery bypass graft surgery in selected patients with left main coronary artery disease: the EXCEL trial Coronary artery bypass graft surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with three-vessel disease and left main coronary disease: 5-year follow-up of the randomised, clinical SYNTAX trial

Clinical Trial12 Sep 2017, [Epub ahead of print]

JOURNAL:Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. Article Link

Usefulness of the SYNTAX score II to validate 2-year outcomes in patients with complex coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A large single-center study

Song Y, Gao Z, Tang X et al. Keywords: complex PCI; left main coronary disease; percutaneous coronary intervention; risk stratification

ABSTRACT

Objective - This study aimed to assess the prognostic ability of synergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with Taxus and cardiac surgery score II (SS-II) in a large cohort of patients with complex coronary artery disease (CAD) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in clinical practice.


Background - Few studies have explored the usefulness of SS-II in nonrandomized clinical patients with complex CAD undergoing temporary PCI.


Methods - We prospectively enrolled 4398 consecutive patients undergoing three-vessel and/or unprotected left main PCI in a single center from January 2013 to December 2013. Patients were stratified according to SS-II for PCI tertiles as follows: SS-II ≤ 20 (n = 1474); SS-II 20-26 (n = 1462); and SS-II > 26 (n = 1462). The predictive ability for 2-year mortality was compared between angiographic scores and scores combining both angiographic and clinical variables.


Results - Mortality was significantly higher in the upper tertile than in the intermediate or lower tertiles during the 2-year follow-up (2.7% vs 1.7% vs 0.5%, respectively; P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that SS-II was an independent predictor of 2-year mortality (hazard ratio: 1.66, 95% confidence interval: 1.03-2.68; P = 0.04). After adjusting for multivariable factors, SS-II had better prediction of 2-year mortality than baseline SS (C-index: SS-II = 0.740 vs baseline SS = 0.620; P < 0.001).


Conclusions - As a risk score combining both anatomical and clinical variables, SS-II demonstrated superiority compared with the purely angiographic SS to predict 2-year mortality in a clinical population of patients with severe CAD undergoing temporary PCI.