CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
English

双重抗血小板治疗持续时间

科研文章

荐读文献

Efficacy and Safety of Ticagrelor Monotherapy in Patients Undergoing Multivessel PCI A new strategy for discontinuation of dual antiplatelet therapy: the RESET Trial (REal Safety and Efficacy of 3-month dual antiplatelet Therapy following Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stent implantation) Antibody-Based Ticagrelor Reversal Agent in Healthy Volunteers Comparison of 1-month Versus 12-month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy after Implantation of Drug-eluting Stents Guided by either Intravascular Ultrasound or Angiography in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome: Rationale and Design of Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled IVUS-ACS & ULTIMATE-DAPT trial Acute Coronary Syndrome, Antiplatelet Therapy, and Bleeding: A Clinical Perspective Outcomes in patients treated with ticagrelor or clopidogrel after acute myocardial infarction: experiences from SWEDEHEART registry Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in elective percutaneous coronary intervention (ALPHEUS): a randomised, open-label, phase 3b trial Ticagrelor Monotherapy Versus Ticagrelor With Aspirin in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Evolution of antithrombotic therapy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a 40-year journey

Original ResearchVolume 12, Issue 10, May 2019

JOURNAL:JACC Cardiovasc Interv. Article Link

Dual-Antiplatelet Therapy Cessation and Cardiovascular Risk in Relation to Age: Analysis From the PARIS Registry

Joyce LC, Baber U, Mehran R et al. Keywords: DAPT; therapy cessation; PCI; age

ABSTRACT


OBJECTIVES- The aim of this study was to examine the association between dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) cessation and cardiovascular risk after percutaneous coronary intervention in relation to age.

 

BACKGROUND - Examination of outcomes by age after percutaneous coronary intervention is relevant given the aging population.

 

METHODS- Two-year clinical outcomes, incidence, and effect of DAPT cessation on outcomes were compared by ages 55, 56 to 74, and 75 years from the PARIS (Patterns of Non-Adherence to Antiplatelet Regimens in Stented Patients) registry. DAPT cessation included physician-recommended discontinuation, interruption for surgery, and disruption (from noncompliance or bleeding). Clinical endpoints were major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (a composite of cardiac death, definite or probable stent thrombosis, spontaneous myocardial infarction, or clinically indicated target lesion revascularization), a secondary restrictive definition of MACE (MACE2) excluding target lesion revascularization, and bleeding.

 

RESULTS - A total of 1,192 patients (24%) were 55 years, 2,869 (57%) were 56 to 74 years, and 957 (19%) were 75 years of age. Patients 75 years of age had higher DAPT cessation rates and increased risk for MACE2, death, cardiac death, and bleeding compared with younger patients. Discontinuation and interruption were not associated with increased cardiovascular risk across age groups, whereas disruption was associated with increased risk for MACE and MACE2 in younger patients but not in patients 75 years of age (p for trend <0.05).

 

CONCLUSIONS- Nonadherence and outcomes vary by age, with patients 75 years having the highest DAPT cessation rates. We observed no association between outcomes and DAPT cessation in patients 75 years, whereas discontinuation was associated with lower MACE rates and disruption with increased MACE rates in patients <75 years.