CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
English

科学研究

科研文章

荐读文献

Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction Association Between Living in Food Deserts and Cardiovascular Risk Basic Biology of Oxidative Stress and the Cardiovascular System: Part 1 of a 3-Part Series Discharge Against Medical Advice After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the United States 2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure Early Diagnosis of Myocardial Infarction With Point-of-Care High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin I The Astronaut Cardiovascular Health and Risk Modification (Astro-CHARM) Coronary Calcium Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk Calculator Heart Failure With Preserved, Borderline, and Reduced Ejection Fraction: 5-Year Outcomes Impact of Optimal Medical Therapy on 10-Year Mortality After Coronary Revascularization Validation of High-Risk Features for Stent-Related Ischemic Events as Endorsed by the 2017 DAPT Guidelines

ConsensusOctober 10, 2017, Volume 136, Issue 15

JOURNAL:Circulation. Article Link

Contemporary Management of Cardiogenic Shock: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

AHA Scientific Statements Keywords: AHA Scientific Statements; delivery of health care; disease management; shock, cardiogenic

ABSTRACT

Cardiogenic shock is a high-acuity, potentially complex, and hemodynamically diverse state of end-organ hypoperfusion that is frequently associated with multisystem organ failure. Despite improving survival in recent years, patient morbidity and mortality remain high, and there are few evidence-based therapeutic interventions known to clearly improve patient outcomes. This scientific statement on cardiogenic shock summarizes the epidemiology, pathophysiology, causes, and outcomes of cardiogenic shock; reviews contemporary best medical, surgical, mechanical circulatory support, and palliative care practices; advocates for the development of regionalized systems of care; and outlines future research priorities.