CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
中 文

Other Relevant Articles

Abstract

Recommended Article

Catheterization Laboratory Considerations During the Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic: From the ACC’s Interventional Council and SCAI Last nail in the coffin for PCI in stable angina? Obesity, Diabetes, and Acute Coronary Syndrome: Differences Between Asians and Whites A Randomized Trial to Assess Regional Left Ventricular Function After Stent Implantation in Chronic Total Occlusion The REVASC Trial Contemporary Antiplatelet Pharmacotherapy in the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes Global, regional, and national age-sex specific mortality for 264 causes of death, 1980–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016 Use of Risk Assessment Tools to Guide Decision-Making in the Primary Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease A Special Report From the American Heart Association and American College of Cardiolog Management of No-Reflow Phenomenon in the Catheterization Laboratory

Original Research2018 Dec 15;273:69-73.

JOURNAL:Int J Cardiol. Article Link

Incidence of contrast-induced acute kidney injury in a large cohort of all-comers undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: Comparison of five contrast media

Azzalini L, Vilca LM, Lombardo F et al. Keywords: contrast media; contrast-induced acute kidney injury; contrast-induced nephropathy; percutaneous coronary intervention

ABSTRACT


BACKGROUND - There is controversy as to whether iso-osmolar contrast media (IOCM) are associated with lower risk of contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI), compared with low-osmolar contrast media (LOCM). We aimed to evaluate if a differential risk of CI-AKI exists after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) according to different contrast media (CM) types.

 

METHODS - We performed a single-center retrospective study in a cohort of all-comers undergoing PCI between January 2012 and December 2016. CI-AKI was defined as an increase in serum creatinine 0.3 mg/dl or 50% within 72 h from PCI. IOCM were represented by iodixanol, whereas four different LOCM were utilized (ioversol, iopromide, iomeprol, iobitridol). Multiple-treatment inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW)-adjusted logistic regression analysis was performed to identify whether CM type was an independent predictor of CI-AKI.


RESULTS - We included 2648 subjects (ioversol, n = 272; iopromide, n = 818; iomeprol, n = 611; iobitridol, n = 460; iodixanol, n = 487). CI-AKI occurred in 300 patients (11.7%) overall, with no differences across CM groups (ioversol 13.0%, iopromide 11.5%, iomeprol 10.2%, iobitridol 13.9%, iodixanol 11.3%; p = 0.42). CI-AKI requiring dialysis was observed in 8 patients (0.3%) overall (p = 0.50). On IPTW-adjusted analysis, none of the LOCM was associated with a significantly different risk of CI-AKI compared with iodixanol: ioversol OR 0.986 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.611-1.591), iopromide OR 0.870 (95% CI 0.606-1.250), iomeprol OR 0.904 (95% CI 0.619-1.319), iobitridol OR 1.258 (95% CI 0.850-1.861).


CONCLUSIONS - In a large cohort of all-comers undergoing PCI, there were no differences in the adjusted risk of CI-AKI across 4 LOCM, compared with iodixanol.

 

Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.