CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
中 文

推荐文献

Abstract

Recommended Article

Update in the Percutaneous Management of Coronary Chronic Total Occlusions Myocardial Inflammation Predicts Remodeling and Neuroinflammation After Myocardial Infarction Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing: What Is its Value? Comparison of Stenting Versus Bypass Surgery According to the Completeness of Revascularization in Severe Coronary Artery Disease: Patient-Level Pooled Analysis of the SYNTAX, PRECOMBAT, and BEST Trials Screening for Atrial Fibrillation With ECG: USPSTF Recommendation Astro-CHARM, the First 10-year ASCVD Risk Estimator Incorporating Coronary Calcium 2017 AHA/ACC Clinical Performance and Quality Measures for Adults With ST-Elevation and Non–ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures Hemodynamic Response to Nitroprusside in Patients With Low-Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis and Preserved Ejection Fraction

ConsensusOctober 10, 2017, Volume 136, Issue 15

JOURNAL:Circulation. Article Link

Contemporary Management of Cardiogenic Shock: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

AHA Scientific Statements Keywords: AHA Scientific Statements; delivery of health care; disease management; shock, cardiogenic

ABSTRACT

Cardiogenic shock is a high-acuity, potentially complex, and hemodynamically diverse state of end-organ hypoperfusion that is frequently associated with multisystem organ failure. Despite improving survival in recent years, patient morbidity and mortality remain high, and there are few evidence-based therapeutic interventions known to clearly improve patient outcomes. This scientific statement on cardiogenic shock summarizes the epidemiology, pathophysiology, causes, and outcomes of cardiogenic shock; reviews contemporary best medical, surgical, mechanical circulatory support, and palliative care practices; advocates for the development of regionalized systems of care; and outlines future research priorities.