CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
中 文

Stenting Left Main

Abstract

Recommended Article

Expansion or contraction of stenting in coronary artery disease? New-onset atrial fibrillation after PCI and CABG for left main disease: insights from the EXCEL trial and additional studies Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease Percutaneous Coronary Intervention vs Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients With Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Radial versus femoral artery access in patients undergoing PCI for left main coronary artery disease: analysis from the EXCEL trial Usefulness of the SYNTAX score II to validate 2-year outcomes in patients with complex coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A large single-center study Outcomes Among Patients Undergoing Distal Left Main Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Percutaneous coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass grafting in treatment of unprotected left main stenosis (NOBLE): a prospective, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial
|<<... 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ...>>|

Original Research2018 Jun 21.[Epub ahead of print]

JOURNAL：Am J Cardiol. Article Link

Comparison of Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention on Native Coronary Arteries Versus on Saphenous Venous Aorta Coronary Conduits in Patients With Low Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction and Impella Device Implantation Achieved or Attempted (from the PROTECT II Randomized Trial and the cVAD Registry)

Shavelle DM, Banerjee S, Maini B et al. Keywords: percutaneous coronary intervention; saphenous vein graft; CABG; multivessel coronary artery disease; unprotected left main disease; severely reduced left ventricular systolic function; Impella supported PCI

ABSTRACT

Patients with prior coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) represent a high-risk cohort given associated medical conditions and worse outcome of saphenous vein graft compared with native vessel percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The goal of the current analysis was to compare clinical outcomes in 591 patients with and without prior CABG and multivessel coronary artery disease or unprotected left main disease and severely reduced left ventricular systolic function underwent Impella supported PCI from the PROTECT II randomized trial and the cVAD Registry. Patients with prior CABG surgery (n = 201) were compared with those without prior CABG surgery (n = 390). The primary end point of this analysis was overall mortality at 30 days. Patients with prior CABG surgery had greater Society of Thoracic Surgery mortality score compared with patients without prior CABG surgery, 7.6 ± 6.4 versus 5.1 ± 5.5, respectively, p <0.001. Saphenous vein graft PCI was performed in 17% of patients with prior CABG surgery. Number of vessels treated was lower in patients with prior CABG surgery compared with patients without prior CABG surgery, 1.66 ± 0.56 versus 1.89 ± 0.64, respectively, p <0.001. Achievement of TIMI 3 flow post PCI and overall PCI success was similar in the two groups. Overall mortality at 30 days was similar in patients with prior CABG surgery compared with patients without prior CABG surgery, 6.75% versus 6.61%, respectively, p = 1.0. In conclusion, in this high-risk cohort of patients underwent hemodynamically supported PCI, prior CABG surgery was not associated with worse outcome. The use of hemodynamic support appears to mitigate the increased risk of PCI associated with prior CABG.

>CBS CBS 2019

> CBS 2019 REGISTRATION

> CBS 2019 PROGRAM

> CBS 2019 CALL FOR SCIENCE

> CBS 2019 SPOTLIGHTS

 CBSMD

> CBSMD WEBSITE REGISTRATION

> EDUCATION CENTER

> RECOMMANDED PAPER

> TOP 10 RESEARCH PAPER

> PRE-READING

CBS 2019 CBS 2019 FACULTY Education Resource CBSMD Scientific Library
Copyright ⓒ CBS MD Nanjing China. All rights reserved. 京ICP备16025898号-11
联系我们| Top