CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
中 文

Stenting Left Main

Abstract

Recommended Article

Intravascular Ultrasound to Guide Left Main Stem Intervention: A Sub-Study of the NOBLE Trial Restricted access Mortality After Repeat Revascularization Following PCI or CABG for Left Main Disease: The EXCEL Trial Unprotected Left Main Disease: Indications and Optimal Strategies for Percutaneous Intervention Predictors of Left Main Coronary Artery Disease in the ISCHEMIA Trial Long-Term Outcomes After PCI or CABG for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease According to Lesion Location Impact of Staging Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Left Main Artery Disease: Insights From the EXCEL Trial Impact of Lesion Preparation Strategies on Outcomes of Left Main PCI: The EXCEL Trial Percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents versus coronary artery bypass grafting in left main coronary artery disease: an individual patient data meta-analysis

Original Research2022 Feb, 79 (7) 651–661

JOURNAL:J Am Coll Cardiol. Article Link

Predictors of Left Main Coronary Artery Disease in the ISCHEMIA Trial

R Senior , HR Reynolds , JK Min et al. Keywords: ISCHEMIA trial; post hoc analysis; LM disease; CTA; stress testing

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND - Detection of 50% diameter stenosis left main coronary artery disease (LMD) has prognostic and therapeutic implications. Noninvasive stress imaging or an exercise tolerance test (ETT) are the most common methods to detect obstructive coronary artery disease, though stress test markers of LMD remain ill-defined.

 

OBJECTIVES - The authors sought to identify markers of LMD as detected on coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA), using clinical and stress testing parameters.

 

METHODS - This was a post hoc analysis of ISCHEMIA (International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness With Medical and Invasive Approaches), including randomized and nonrandomized participants who had locally determined moderate or severe ischemia on nonimaging ETT, stress nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging, or stress echocardiography followed by CTA to exclude LMD. Stress tests were read by core laboratories. Prior coronary artery bypass grafting was an exclusion. In a stepped multivariate model, the authors identified predictors of LMD, first without and then with stress testing parameters.

 

RESULTS - Among 5,146 participants (mean age 63 years, 74% male), 414 (8%) had LMD. Predictors of LMD were older age (P < 0.001), male sex (P < 0.01), absence of prior myocardial infarction (P < 0.009), transient ischemic dilation of the left ventricle on stress echocardiography (P = 0.05), magnitude of ST-segment depression on ETT (P = 0.004), and peak metabolic equivalents achieved on ETT (P = 0.001). The models were weakly predictive of LMD (C-index 0.643 and 0.684).

 

CONCLUSIONS - In patients with moderate or severe ischemia, clinical and stress testing parameters were weakly predictive of LMD on CTA. For most patients with moderate or severe ischemia, anatomical imaging is needed to rule out LMD. (International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness With Medical and Invasive Approaches [ISCHEMIA]; NCT01471522)