CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
中 文

左主干支架

Abstract

Recommended Article

Randomized Trial of Stents Versus Bypass Surgery for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: 5-Year Outcomes of the PRECOMBAT Study Complex PCI procedures: challenges for the interventional cardiologist Sex differences in left main coronary artery stenting: Different characteristics but similar outcomes for women compared with men Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Using Drug-Eluting Stents Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials Left Main Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients With Prior Cerebrovascular Disease: Results From the EXCEL Trial Impact of coronary anatomy and stenting technique on long-term outcome after drug-eluting stent implantation for unprotected left main coronary artery disease Clinical and angiographic outcomes of patients treated with everolimus-eluting stents or first-generation Paclitaxel-eluting stents for unprotected left main disease Comparison of Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention on Native Coronary Arteries Versus on Saphenous Venous Aorta Coronary Conduits in Patients With Low Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction and Impella Device Implantation Achieved or Attempted (from the PROTECT II Randomized Trial and the cVAD Registry)

Clinical Trial12 Sep 2017, [Epub ahead of print]

JOURNAL:Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. Article Link

Usefulness of the SYNTAX score II to validate 2-year outcomes in patients with complex coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A large single-center study

Song Y, Gao Z, Tang X et al. Keywords: complex PCI; left main coronary disease; percutaneous coronary intervention; risk stratification

ABSTRACT

Objective - This study aimed to assess the prognostic ability of synergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with Taxus and cardiac surgery score II (SS-II) in a large cohort of patients with complex coronary artery disease (CAD) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in clinical practice.


Background - Few studies have explored the usefulness of SS-II in nonrandomized clinical patients with complex CAD undergoing temporary PCI.


Methods - We prospectively enrolled 4398 consecutive patients undergoing three-vessel and/or unprotected left main PCI in a single center from January 2013 to December 2013. Patients were stratified according to SS-II for PCI tertiles as follows: SS-II ≤ 20 (n = 1474); SS-II 20-26 (n = 1462); and SS-II > 26 (n = 1462). The predictive ability for 2-year mortality was compared between angiographic scores and scores combining both angiographic and clinical variables.


Results - Mortality was significantly higher in the upper tertile than in the intermediate or lower tertiles during the 2-year follow-up (2.7% vs 1.7% vs 0.5%, respectively; P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that SS-II was an independent predictor of 2-year mortality (hazard ratio: 1.66, 95% confidence interval: 1.03-2.68; P = 0.04). After adjusting for multivariable factors, SS-II had better prediction of 2-year mortality than baseline SS (C-index: SS-II = 0.740 vs baseline SS = 0.620; P < 0.001).


Conclusions - As a risk score combining both anatomical and clinical variables, SS-II demonstrated superiority compared with the purely angiographic SS to predict 2-year mortality in a clinical population of patients with severe CAD undergoing temporary PCI.