CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
中 文

左主干支架

Abstract

Recommended Article

Revascularization of left main coronary artery Left Main Revascularization in 2017: Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting or Percutaneous Coronary Intervention? Optimizing outcomes during left main percutaneous coronary intervention with intravascular ultrasound and fractional flow reserve: the current state of evidence Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Left Main Disease: Pre- and Post-EXCEL (Evaluation of XIENCE Everolimus Eluting Stent Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for Effectiveness of Left Main Revascularization) and NOBLE (Nordic-Baltic-British Left Main Revascularization Study) Era Safety of intermediate left main stenosis revascularization deferral based on fractional flow reserve and intravascular ultrasound: A systematic review and meta-regression including 908 deferred left main stenosis from 12 studies Percutaneous coronary intervention in left main coronary artery disease: the 13th consensus document from the European Bifurcation Club Long-Term Clinical Outcomes and Optimal Stent Strategy in Left Main Coronary Bifurcation Stenting Access Site and Outcomes for Unprotected Left Main Stem Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: An Analysis of the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society Database

Review Article

JOURNAL:Clin Res Cardiol. Article Link

Complex PCI procedures: challenges for the interventional cardiologist

Werner N, Nickenig G, Sinning JM. Keywords: PCI procedures


In recent years, the percentage of patients with multivessel disease and multiple complex stenoses have significantly increased. One factor contributing to this increase is the proportion of elderly and very elderly patients who have been turned down by the Heart Team for surgical revascularization (Landes et al. in Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.27375 , 2017; Waldo et al. in Circulation 130:2295-2301, https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.011541 , 2014). In addition, the marked increase in patients with significant comorbidities further contributes to the increase in patients referred to the interventional cardiologist for stenting procedures. Mostly, the complexity of these patients is characterized not only by their comorbidities but also by multivessel disease, bifurcation disease, left main disease, or stenoses of calcified or tortuous vessels, degenerated saphenous vein graft lesions, and thrombotic lesions (Kirtane et al. in Circulation 134:422-431, 2016; Gennaro Giustino et al. in JACC 86:1851-1864, 2016) These specific lesion types are typically associated with lower rates of procedural success and higher rates of recurrence or major adverse cardiac events (Kirtane et al. 2016) Coming along with this problem, virtually no study exists evaluating revascularization strategies, i.e. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), coronary artery bypass graft surgery, or medical therapy alone in complex patients with complex coronary anatomy. Therefore, we are confronted with an increasing patient population that is understudied and potentially underserved. In the absence of robust, accurate, objective, and consistent evidence which could help us in decision-making (e.g. best revascularization strategy, complication prevention, post-interventional medical therapy), we have to stick to personal experience and patients' preferences. In this article, we provide an overview about common definition of complex PCI, general strategies to help decision-making in these patients, and give an overview about post-interventional medical treatment.