CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
中 文

血管内超声指导

Abstract

Recommended Article

Impact of intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary intervention on long-term clinical outcomes in a real world population Clinical impact of intravascular ultrasound-guided chronic total occlusion intervention with zotarolimus-eluting versus biolimus-eluting stent implantation: randomized study Intravascular ultrasound predictors for edge restenosis after newer generation drug-eluting stent implantation A Randomized Study of Distal Filter Protection Versus Conventional Treatment During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Attenuated Plaque Identified by Intravascular Ultrasound Consensus from the 5th European Bifurcation Club meeting Role of Proximal Optimization Technique Guided by Intravascular Ultrasound on Stent Expansion, Stent Symmetry Index, and Side-Branch Hemodynamics in Patients With Coronary Bifurcation Lesions Temporal Trends in Inpatient Use of Intravascular Imaging Among Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the United States First-in-man evaluation of intravascular optical frequency domain imaging (OFDI) of Terumo: a comparison with intravascular ultrasound and quantitative coronary angiography

Original Research2013 Feb;81(3):407-16.

JOURNAL:Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. Article Link

Impact of intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary intervention on long-term clinical outcomes in a real world population

Hur SH, Kang SJ, Park SJ et al. Keywords: IVUS guided PCI; angiography-guided PCI; DES; outcome

ABSTRACT


OBJECTIVES -  To compare long-term clinical outcomes between intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided and angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in a large "real world" registry.


BACKGROUND - The impact of IVUS-guided PCI on clinical outcomes remains unclear.


METHODS - Between January 1998 and February 2006, 8,371 patients who underwent IVUS- (n = 4,627) or angiography- (n = 3,744) guided PCI were consecutively enrolled. Three-year clinical outcomes were compared after adjustment for inverse-probability-of-treatment weighting (IPTW) in the overall population and in separate populations according to stent type.


RESULTS - A crude analysis of the overall population showed that the 3-year mortality rate was significantly lower in the IVUS-guided group than in the angiography-guided group (96.4% ± 0.3% vs. 93.6% ± 0.4%, log-rank P < 0.001). When adjusted by IPTW, patients undergoing IVUS-guided PCI remained at lower risk of mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 0.627; 95% CI 0.50-0.79, P < 0.001). Similarly, in the drug-eluting stent (DES) population, the 3-year risk of mortality was significantly lower in patients undergoing IVUS-guided PCI (HR 0.46; 95% CI 0.33-0.66, P < 0.001). In contrast, IVUS-guided PCI did not reduce the risk of mortality in the bare metal stent population (HR 0.82; 95% CI 0.60-1.10, P = 0.185). However, the risks of myocardial infarction (HR 0.95; 95% CI 0.63-1.44, P = 0.810), target vessel revascularization (HR 1.00; 95% CI 0.86-1.15, P = 0.944), and stent thrombosis (HR 0.82; 95% CI 0.53-1.07, P = 0.109) were not associated with IVUS guidance.


CONCLUSIONS - IVUS-guided PCI may reduce long-term mortality when compared with conventional angiography-guided PCI. This may encourage the routine use of IVUS for PCI in patients undergoing DES implantation. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

 

Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.