CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
中 文

Drug Coated Balloon

Abstract

Recommended Article

Percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-coated balloon-only strategy in stable coronary artery disease and in acute coronary syndromes: An all-comers registry study Treatment of Very Small De Novo Coronary Artery Disease With 2.0 mm Drug-Coated Balloons Showed 1-Year Clinical Outcome Comparable With 2.0 mm Drug-Eluting Stents Percutaneous coronary interventional strategies for treatment of in-stent restenosis: a network meta-analysis Drug-Coated Balloons for Coronary Artery Disease: Third Report of the International DCB Consensus Group Treatment of Drug-Eluting Stent In-Stent Restenosis With Drug-Eluting Balloons: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Long-term efficacy and safety of drug-coated balloons versus drug-eluting stents for small coronary artery disease (BASKET-SMALL 2): 3-year follow-up of a randomised, non-inferiority trial Bare metal or drug-eluting stent versus drug-coated balloon in non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: the randomised PEPCAD NSTEMI trial Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty Versus Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation in Patients With Coronary Stent Restenosis

Original Research2018 Oct 31. [Epub ahead of print]

JOURNAL:Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. Article Link

Percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-coated balloon-only strategy in stable coronary artery disease and in acute coronary syndromes: An all-comers registry study

Uskela S, Kärkkäinen JM, Eränen J et al. Keywords: bleeding risk; drug-eluting balloon; myocardial infarction

ABSTRACT



OBJECTIVES - The aim of this single center all-comers retrospective registry study was to assess the efficacy and safety of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using drug-coated balloon (DCB) in de novo lesions including large proximal coronary arteries.

 

METHODS - A total of 487 PCIs were performed using paclitaxel-coated DCB in 562 de novo lesions with the possibility for bailout stenting in a patient population presenting with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) or acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Half of the patients had at least one risk factor for bleeding. All of the treated lesions were de novo and 60% of DCBs used were 3.0 mm in diameter. The median follow-up time was 18 months for MACE and 60 months for survival.

 

RESULTS - The total mortality after DBC only strategy was 2.3 and 9.3% at 12 months in stable CAD and ACS, respectively. The 12-month MACE rate was 7.1 and 12% in stable CAD and ACS. The rate of ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization was only 1.4% in stable CAD and 2.8% after ACS at 12 months. Median duration of DAPT was one month. The 12 month rate of significant bleeding (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium types 2-5) was 5.9%. Acute vessel closure occurred only in one case (0.2%) after DCB treatment. Bailout stenting was used in 12% of lesions.

 

CONCLUSIONS - PCI using DCB-only strategy with the possibility for provisional stenting is a safe and efficient in de novo coronary artery lesions in both stable CAD and ACS. This strategy may be useful especially in patients with high bleeding risk.