CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
中 文

Acute Coronary Syndrom

Abstract

Recommended Article

Radial versus femoral access and bivalirudin versus unfractionated heparin in invasively managed patients with acute coronary syndrome (MATRIX): final 1-year results of a multicentre, randomised controlled trial 4-Step Protocol for Disparities in STEMI Care and Outcomes in Women Long-term survival and causes of death in patients with ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome without obstructive coronary artery disease Sex differences in discharge destination following acute myocardial infarction How Will the Transition to hs-cTn Affect the Diagnosis of Type 1 and 2 MI? Impact of the US Food and Drug Administration–Approved Sex-Specific Cutoff Values for High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T to Diagnose Myocardial Infarction Managing Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease in Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Comprehensive Review Early invasive versus non-invasive treatment in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (FRISC-II): 15 year follow-up of a prospective, randomised, multicentre study

Clinical Trial2018 Jun;200:17-23.

JOURNAL:Am J Cardiol. Article Link

An open-Label, 2 × 2 factorial, randomized controlled trial to evaluate the safety of apixaban vs. vitamin K antagonist and aspirin vs. placebo in patients with atrial fibrillation and acute coronary syndrome and/or percutaneous coronary intervention: Rationale and design of the AUGUSTUS trial

Lopes RD, Vora AN, Liaw D et al. Keywords: apixaban; vitamin K antagonist; aspirin; placebo; ACS; PCI;

FULL TEXT PDF