CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
中 文

Fractional Flow Reserve

Abstract

Recommended Article

Cutoff Value and Long-Term Prediction of Clinical Events by FFR Measured Immediately After Implantation of a Drug-Eluting Stent in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: 1- to 3-Year Results From the DKCRUSH VII Registry Study Randomized Comparison of FFR-Guided and Angiography-Guided Provisional Stenting of True Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: The DKCRUSH-VI Trial (Double Kissing Crush Versus Provisional Stenting Technique for Treatment of Coronary Bifurcation Lesions VI) Prognostic Value of Fractional Flow Reserve Measured Immediately After Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation Influence of Local Myocardial Damage on Index of Microcirculatory Resistance and Fractional Flow Reserve in Target and Nontarget Vascular Territories in a Porcine Microvascular Injury Model FFR-guided multivessel stenting reduces urgent revascularization compared with infarct-related artery only stenting in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Clinical Outcomes and Cost-Effectiveness of Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease: Three-Year Follow-Up of the FAME 2 Trial (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) Diagnostic Accuracy of Angiography-Based Quantitative Flow Ratio Measurements for Online Assessment of Coronary Stenosis Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guidance of PCI in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (FAME): 5-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial

Clinical Trial2017 Dec 1;248:92-96 [Epub 2017 Aug 18]

JOURNAL:Int J Cardiol. Article Link

Anatomical plaque and vessel characteristics are associated with hemodynamic indices including fractional flow reserve and coronary flow reserve: A prospective exploratory intravascular ultrasound analysis

Brown AJ, Giblett JP, Hoole SP et al. Keywords: Coronary artery disease; Coronary flow reserve; Coronary physiology; Fractional flow reserve; Intravascular ultrasound

ABSTRACT


OBJECTIVES - To assess the relationship between anatomical form and physiological function in atherosclerotic coronary arteries.


BACKGROUND - Although adverse cardiovascular events are predicted by plaque morphology or invasively-derived hemodynamic indices, the link between these important prognostic measures remains unexplored.


METHODS - Patients with stable angina underwent fractional flow reserve (FFR), coronary flow reserve (CFR), pressure-derived collateral flow index (CFIp), trans-myocardial biomarker sampling and radiofrequency intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) imaging prior to intervention. Physiological ischemia was defined as either FFR≤0.8 or CFR<2.0.


RESULTS - Mean FFR was 0.70±0.15 and CFR was 2.1±1.3, with 68/92 lesions having FFR≤0.8 and 61/92 having CFR<2.0. On IVUS, FFR≤0.8 lesions had reduced minimal luminal area (MLA, p=0.03), increased plaqueburden (PB, p=0.04) and volume (p=0.01). There was no relationship between FFR and IVUS-defined plaque composition. FFR≤0.8 was observed in 75.3%, 72.4% and 70.4% of lesions with MLA≤4mm2, PB≥70% and thin-cap fibroatheroma, respectively. Multivariate regression demonstrated FFR≤0.8 was independently predicted by MLA (odds ratio (OR) 0.53, 95% CI 0.29-0.97, p=0.04) and PB (OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.01-1.21, p=0.03). There were no identifiable relationships between plaque structure and CFR or CFIp. CFR<2.0 was associated with whole vessel necrotic core increases (p=0.047), fibrofatty tissue reduction (p=0.004) and elevated baseline transmyocardial high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) gradients (p=0.02).


CONCLUSIONS - Measures of plaque structure including PB and MLA are independently associated with FFR, but not with CFR or CFIp. Instead, vessels with low CFR have increased lipid accumulation and a higher transmyocardial hsCRP gradient. These results may explain similarities in clinical outcomes between physiologically and anatomically orientated trials.