CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
中 文

二尖瓣/三尖瓣瓣膜

Abstract

Recommended Article

Novel Transcatheter Mitral Valve Prosthesis for Patients With Severe Mitral Annular Calcification Prospective Evaluation of Transseptal TMVR for Failed Surgical Bioprostheses: MITRAL Trial Valve-in-Valve Arm 1-Year Outcomes MITRA-FR vs. COAPT: Lessons from two trials with diametrically opposed results Current Status and Future Prospects of Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement: JACC State-of-the-Art Review Functional Mitral Regurgitation Outcome and Grading in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction Incidence and Standardized Definitions of Mitral Valve Leaflet Adverse Events After Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair: the EXPAND Study The Art of SAPIEN 3 Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement in Valve-in-Ring and Valve-in-Mitral-Annular-Calcification Procedures Thirty-Day Outcomes Following Transfemoral Transseptal Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement: Intrepid TMVR Early Feasibility Study Results

Original ResearchJul 14, 2021.

JOURNAL:J Am Coll Cardiol Img. Article Link

Functional Mitral Regurgitation Outcome and Grading in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction

G Benfari , C Antoine , B Essayagh et al. Keywords: functional mitral regurgitation; HFrEF; mortality; EROA

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES - This study aims to define excess-mortality linked to functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) quantified in routine-practice.


BACKGROUND - Appraisal of FMR in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is challenging because risks of excess mortality remain uncertain and guidelines diverge.


METHODS - Cases of HFrEF (ejection-fraction <50%) Stage B-C that were diagnosed between 2003 and 2011 and had routine-practice FMR quantitation (FMR cohort, n = 6,381) were analyzed for excess mortality thresholds/rates within the cohort and in comparison to the general population. These were also compared to those of a degenerative mitral regurgitation (DMR) simultaneous cohort (DMR cohort, n = 2,416).


RESULTS - In the FMR cohort (age: 70 ± 11 years, ejection fraction: 36 ± 10%, effective regurgitant orifice area [EROA]: 0.09 ± 0.13 cm2), EROA distribution was skewed towards low-values (0.40 cm2 in only 8% vs 38% for the DMR cohort; P < 0.0001). One-year mortality was high (15.6%), increasing steeply from 13.3% without FMR to 28.5% with EROA 0.30 cm2 (adjusted odds ratio: 1.57 [95% CI: 1.19-2.97]; P = 0.001). In the long term, 3,538 FMR cohort patients died with excess mortality threshold 0.10 cm2 (vs 0.20 cm2 in the DMR cohort), with 0.10 cm2 EROA increments independently associated with considerable mortality increment (adjusted HR: 1.11 [95% CI: 1.08-1.15]; P < 0.0001) and with no detectable interaction. Compared to the general population, FMR excess mortality increased exponentially with higher EROA (risk ratio point estimates 2.8, 3.8, and 5.1 at EROA 0.20, 0.30, and 0.40 cm2, respectively), and was much steeper than that of the DMR cohort (P < 0.0001). In nested models, individualized EROA was the strongest FMR survival marker, and a new expanded FMR grading scale based on 0.10 cm2 EROA increments provided incremental power over current American Heart AssociationAmerican College of Cardiology/European Society of Cardiology guidelines (all P < 0.03).


CONCLUSIONS - In HFrEF, FMR is skewed towards smaller EROA. Nevertheless, when measured in routine practice, EROA is the strongest independent FMR determinant of survival after diagnosis. Excess mortality increases exponentially above the threshold of 0.10 cm2, with a much steeper slope than in DMR, for any EROA increment. An expanded EROA-based stratification, superior to existing grading schemes in determining survival, should allow guideline harmonization.