CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
中 文

Scientific Library

Abstract

Recommended Article

Atrial Fibrillation and the Prognostic Performance of Biomarkers in Heart Failure Long-Term Durability of Transcatheter Heart Valves: Insights From Bench Testing to 25 Years Clinical Significance of Concordance or Discordance Between Fractional Flow Reserve and Coronary Flow Reserve for Coronary Physiological Indices, Microvascular Resistance, and Prognosis After Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Early Rhythm-Control Therapy in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation AIM2-driven inflammasome activation in heart failure A pragmatic approach to the use of inotropes for the management of acute and advanced heart failure: An expert panel consensus Contemporary real-world outcomes of surgical aortic valve replacement in 141,905 low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk patients Randomized study on simple versus complex stenting of coronary artery bifurcation lesions: the Nordic bifurcation study

Original Research2020 Dec 5;hvaa287.

JOURNAL:Clin Chem. Article Link

Atrial Fibrillation and the Prognostic Performance of Biomarkers in Heart Failure

ESJ Tan, S-P Chan, O-W Liew et al. Keywords: AF; HF; biomarkers; 2-year outcome

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND - Consideration of circulating biomarkers for risk stratification in heart failure (HF) is recommended, but the influence of atrial fibrillation (AF) on prognostic performance of many markers is unclear. We investigated the influence of AF on the prognostic performance of circulating biomarkers in HF.

METHODS - N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), mid-regional-pro-atrial natriuretic peptide, C-type natriuretic peptide (CNP), NT-proCNP, high-sensitivity troponin-T, high-sensitivity troponin-I, mid-regional-propeptide adrenomedullin, co-peptin, growth differentiation factor-15, soluble Suppressor of Tumorigenicitiy (sST2), galectin-3, and procalcitonin plasma concentrations were measured in a prospective, multicenter study of adults with HF. AF was defined as a previous history of AF, and/or presence of AF/flutter on baseline 12-lead electrocardiogram. The primary outcome was the composite of HF-hospitalization or all-cause mortality at 2 years.

RESULTS - Among 1099 patients (age 62 ± 12years, 28% female), 261(24%) patients had AF. Above-median concentrations of all biomarkers were independently associated with increased risk of the primary outcome. Significant interactions with AF were detected for galectin-3 and sST2. In considering NT-proBNP for additive risk stratification, sST2 (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR]1.85, 95%confidence interval [C.I.] 1.17-2.91) and galectin-3 (AHR1.85, 95%C.I. 1.09-2.45) were independently associated with increased primary outcome only in the presence of AF. The prognostic performance of sST2 was also stronger in AF for all-cause mortality (AF: AHR2.82, 95%C.I. 1.26-6.21; non-AF: AHR1.78, 95% C.I. 1.14-2.76 without AF), while galectin-3 predicted HF-hospitalization only in AF (AHR1.64, 95%C.I. 1.03-2.62).

CONCLUSIONS - AF modified the prognostic utility of selected guideline-endorsed HF-biomarkers. Application of markers for prognostic purposes in HF requires consideration of the presence or absence of AF.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION - ACTRN12610000374066.