CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
中 文

Scientific Library

Abstract

Recommended Article

Frailty and Clinical Outcomes of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin in Older Adults With Atrial Fibrillation: A Cohort Study 2017 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for Management of Patients With Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society Utility of intravascular ultrasound guidance in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for type C lesions The Use of Sex-Specific Factors in the Assessment of Women’s Cardiovascular Risk Effects of empagliflozin on first and recurrent clinical events in patients with type 2 diabetes and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: a secondary analysis of the EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial Operator Experience and Outcomes After Left Main Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Hypertension: Do Inflammation and Immunity Hold the Key to Solving this Epidemic? Transcatheter Laceration of Aortic Leaflets to Prevent Coronary Obstruction During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Concept to First-in-Human

Original Research20 July 2021

JOURNAL:Ann Intern Med. Article Link

Frailty and Clinical Outcomes of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin in Older Adults With Atrial Fibrillation: A Cohort Study

DH Kim, A Pawar, JJ Gagne et al. Keywords: DOACs vs. warfarin; AF; dabigatran; rivaroxaban; apixaban

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND - The role of differing levels of frailty in the choice of oral anticoagulants for older adults with atrial fibrillation (AF) is unclear.

OBJECTIVE - To examine the outcomes of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus warfarin by frailty levels.

DESIGN - 1:1 propensity scorematched analysis of Medicare data, 2010 to 2017.

SETTING - Community.

PATIENTS - Medicare beneficiaries with AF who initiated use of dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, or warfarin.

MEASUREMENTS - Composite end point of death, ischemic stroke, or major bleeding by frailty levels, defined by a claims-based frailty index.

RESULTS - In the dabigatranwarfarin cohort (n = 158 730; median follow-up, 72 days), the event rate per 1000 person-years was 63.5 for dabigatran initiators and 65.6 for warfarin initiators (hazard ratio [HR], 0.98 [95% CI, 0.92 to 1.05]; rate difference [RD], 2.2 [CI, 6.5 to 2.1]). For nonfrail, prefrail, and frail persons, HRs were 0.81 (CI, 0.68 to 0.97), 0.98 (CI, 0.90 to 1.08), and 1.09 (CI, 0.96 to 1.23), respectively. In the rivaroxabanwarfarin cohort (n = 275 944; median follow-up, 82 days), the event rate per 1000 person-years was 77.8 for rivaroxaban initiators and 83.7 for warfarin initiators (HR, 0.98 [CI, 0.94 to 1.02]; RD, 5.9 [CI, 9.4 to 2.4]). For nonfrail, prefrail, and frail persons, HRs were 0.88 (CI, 0.77 to 0.99), 1.04 (CI, 0.98 to 1.10), and 0.96 (CI, 0.89 to 1.04), respectively. In the apixabanwarfarin cohort (n = 218 738; median follow-up, 84 days), the event rate per 1000 person-years was 60.1 for apixaban initiators and 92.3 for warfarin initiators (HR, 0.68 [CI, 0.65 to 0.72]; RD, 32.2 [CI, 36.1 to 28.3]). For nonfrail, prefrail, and frail persons, HRs were 0.61 (CI, 0.52 to 0.71), 0.66 (CI, 0.61 to 0.70), and 0.73 (CI, 0.67 to 0.80), respectively.

LIMITATIONS - Residual confounding and lack of clinical frailty assessment.

CONCLUSION - For older adults with AF, apixaban was associated with lower rates of adverse events across all frailty levels. Dabigatran and rivaroxaban were associated with lower event rates only among nonfrail patients.