CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
English

科学研究

科研文章

荐读文献

Non-invasive detection of coronary inflammation using computed tomography and prediction of residual cardiovascular risk (the CRISP CT study): a post-hoc analysis of prospective outcome data Association of Effective Regurgitation Orifice Area to Left Ventricular End-Diastolic Volume Ratio With Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair OutcomesA Secondary Analysis of the COAPT Trial Comprehensive comparative effectiveness and safety of first-line antihypertensive drug classes: a systematic, multinational, large-scale analysis Association of Coronary Artery Calcium With Long-term, Cause-Specific Mortality Among Young Adults Stroke Rates Following Surgical Versus Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients With Symptomatic Severe Bicuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis Randomized Evaluation of TriGuard 3 Cerebral Embolic Protection After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: REFLECT II Expansion or contraction of stenting in coronary artery disease? 2020 ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway on Management of Conduction Disturbances in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement A Report of the American College of Cardiology Solution Set Oversight Committee Comparison of Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention on Native Coronary Arteries Versus on Saphenous Venous Aorta Coronary Conduits in Patients With Low Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction and Impella Device Implantation Achieved or Attempted (from the PROTECT II Randomized Trial and the cVAD Registry)
|<<... 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 ...>>|

Expert Opinion2017 Feb 28;135(9):819-821.

JOURNAL：Circulation Article Link

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients With Left Main and Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: Do We Have the Evidence?

Gersh BJ, Stone GW, Bhatt DL et al. Keywords: coronary artery bypass grafting; coronary artery disease; stenting

ABSTRACT

Approximately 60 randomized controlled trials performed over the last 3 decades have failed to demonstrate statistically significant differences in death or myocardial infarction (MI) between coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), apart from a few notable exceptions in which CABG was superior to PCI. The benefits for CABG have been reported in patients with diabetes mellitus with multivessel disease and in patients with and without diabetes mellitus with 3-vessel disease and intermediate or high SYNTAX trial (Synergy between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery) scores (≥23).
>CBS CBS 2019

> CBS 2019

> CBS 2019 注册

> CBS 2019 会议日程

> CBS 2019 学术征集

> CBS 2019 热点

 CBSMD

> CBSMD 网站注册

> 教育中心

> 荐读文献

> Top 10 阅读文献

> 文献导读
CBS 2019 CBS 2019 主席团 教育中心 科研动态
Copyright ⓒ CBS MD Nanjing China. All rights reserved. 京ICP备16025898号-11
联系我们| Top