CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
English

科学研究

科研文章

荐读文献

No causal effects of plasma homocysteine levels on the risk of coronary heart disease or acute myocardial infarction: A Mendelian randomization study Invasive Versus Medical Management in Patients With Prior Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery With a Non-ST Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial Impact of percutaneous coronary intervention extent, complexity and platelet reactivity on outcomes after drug-eluting stent implantation Outcome of Applying the ESC 0/1-hour Algorithm in Patients With Suspected Myocardial Infarction Hs-cTroponins for the prediction of recurrent cardiovascular events in patients with established CHD - A comparative analysis from the KAROLA study Invasive Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Incidence, predictors, and outcomes of DAPT disruption due to non-compliance vs. bleeding after PCI: insights from the PARIS Registry Shock Team Approach in Refractory Cardiogenic Shock Requiring Short-Term Mechanical Circulatory Support: A Proof of Concept SCAI clinical expert consensus statement on the classification of cardiogenic shock: This document was endorsed by the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the American Heart Association (AHA), the Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM), and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) in April 2019 Proportion and Morphological Features of Restenosis Lesions With Acute Coronary Syndrome in Different Timings of Target Lesion Revascularization After Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation
|<<... 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 ...>>|

Expert Opinion2017 Feb 28;135(9):819-821.

JOURNAL：Circulation Article Link

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients With Left Main and Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: Do We Have the Evidence?

Gersh BJ, Stone GW, Bhatt DL et al. Keywords: coronary artery bypass grafting; coronary artery disease; stenting

ABSTRACT

Approximately 60 randomized controlled trials performed over the last 3 decades have failed to demonstrate statistically significant differences in death or myocardial infarction (MI) between coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), apart from a few notable exceptions in which CABG was superior to PCI. The benefits for CABG have been reported in patients with diabetes mellitus with multivessel disease and in patients with and without diabetes mellitus with 3-vessel disease and intermediate or high SYNTAX trial (Synergy between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery) scores (≥23).
>CBS CBS 2019

> CBS 2019

> CBS 2019 注册

> CBS 2019 会议日程

> CBS 2019 学术征集

> CBS 2019 热点

 CBSMD

> CBSMD 网站注册

> 教育中心

> 荐读文献

> Top 10 阅读文献

> 文献导读
CBS 2019 CBS 2019 主席团 教育中心 科研动态
Copyright ⓒ CBS MD Nanjing China. All rights reserved. 京ICP备16025898号-11
联系我们| Top