CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
English

科学研究

科研文章

荐读文献

Adenosine and adenosine receptor-mediated action in coronary microcirculation Apolipoprotein A-V is a potential target for treating coronary artery disease: evidence from genetic and metabolomic analyses Impact of Percutaneous Revascularization on Exercise Hemodynamics in Patients With Stable Coronary Disease Leaflet immobility and thrombosis in transcatheter aortic valve replacement Determinants and Impact of Heart Failure Readmission Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Patterns of calcification in coronary artery disease. A statistical analysis of intravascular ultrasound and coronary angiography in 1155 lesions Computed tomography angiography-derived extracellular volume fraction predicts early recovery of left ventricular systolic function after transcatheter aortic valve replacement Contemporary Use and Trends in Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the United States: An Analysis of the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Research to Practice Initiative Left Ventricular Rapid Pacing Via the Valve Delivery Guidewire in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Impact of Pre-Existing and New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation on Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Review Article2014 Apr 15;113(8):1338-47

JOURNAL:Am J Cardiol. Article Link

Meta-analysis of outcomes after intravascular ultrasound-guided versus angiography-guided drug-eluting stent implantation in 26,503 patients enrolled in three randomized trials and 14 observational studies

Ahn JM, Kang SJ, Park SJ et al. Keywords: IVUS guided PCI; angiography-guided PCI; DES; outcome

ABSTRACT


There are conflicting data regarding the benefit of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) over angiography-guided PCI. Since the last meta-analysis was published, several new studies have been reported. We performed a comprehensive meta-analysis to evaluate the clinical impact of IVUS-guided PCI with drug-elutingstent compared with conventional angiography-guided PCI. This meta-analysis included 26,503 patients from 3 randomized and 14observationalstudies; 12,499 patients underwent IVUS-guided PCI and 14,004 underwent angiography-guided PCI. Main outcome measures were total mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), stent thrombosis, and target lesion revascularization (TLR). IVUS-guided PCI was significantly associated with more stents, longer stents, and larger stents. Regarding clinical outcomes, IVUS-guided PCI was associated with a significantly lower risk of TLR (odds ratio [OR] 0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.66 to 1.00, p=0.046). In addition, the risk of death (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.79, p<0.001), MI (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.75, p<0.001), and stent thrombosis (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.75, p<0.001) were also decreased. In conclusion, our meta-analysis demonstrated that IVUS-guided PCI was associated with lower risk of death, MI, TLR, and stent thrombosis after drug-eluting stenti mplantation.