CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
English

科学研究

科研文章

荐读文献

Mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting for coronary artery disease: a pooled analysis of individual patient data Two-year outcomes of everolimus vs. paclitaxel-eluting stent for the treatment of unprotected left main lesions: a propensity score matching comparison of patients included in the French Left Main Taxus (FLM Taxus) and the LEft MAin Xience (LEMAX) registries Robustness of Fractional Flow Reserve for Lesion Assessment in Non-Infarct-Related Arteries of Patients With Myocardial Infarction Volumetric characterization of human coronary calcification by frequency-domain optical coherence tomography Device specificity of vascular healing following implantation of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds and bioabsorbable polymer metallic drug-eluting stents in human coronary arteries: the ESTROFA OCT BVS vs. BP-DES study Instantaneous Wave-free Ratio versus Fractional Flow Reserve to Guide PCI The Relation Between Optical Coherence Tomography-Detected Layered Pattern and Acute Side Branch Occlusion After Provisional Stenting of Coronary Bifurcation Lesions Fate of post-procedural malapposition of everolimus-eluting polymeric bioresorbable scaffold and everolimus-eluting cobalt chromiummetallic stent in human coronary arteries: sequential assessment with optical coherence tomography in ABSORB Japan trial Use of the Instantaneous Wave-free Ratio or Fractional Flow Reserve in PCI Low shear stress induces endothelial reactive oxygen species via the AT1R/eNOS/NO pathway

Original Research2018 Nov;6(11):940-948.

JOURNAL:JACC Heart Fail. Article Link

Heart Failure Outcomes With Volume-Guided Management

JE Strobeck, J Feldschuh, WL Miller. Keywords: 30-day readmission;blood volume analysis;heart failure;hypervolemia;true anemia

ABSTRACT



OBJECTIVES - This study performed a retrospective outcome analyses of a large cohort of mixed ejection fraction patients admitted for acute heart failure (HF), whose inpatient care was guided by individual quantitative blood volume analysis (BVA) results.

BACKGROUNDDecongestion strategies in patients hospitalized for HF are based on clinical assessment of volume and have not integrated a quantitative intravascular volume metric.

METHODSPropensity score control matching analysis was performed in 245 consecutive HF admissions to a community hospital (September 2007 to April 2014; 78 ± 10 years of age; 50% with HF with reduced ejection fraction [HFrEF]; and 30% with Stage 4 chronic kidney disease). Total blood volume (TBV), red blood cell volume (RBCV), and plasma volume (PV) were measured at admission by using iodine-131-labeled albumin indicator-dilution technique. Decongestion strategy targeted a TBV threshold of 6% to 8% above patient-specific normative values. Anemia was treated based on cause. Hematocrit (Hct) measurements were monitored to assess effectiveness of interventions. Control subjects derived from Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services data were matched 10:1 for demographics, comorbidity, and year of treatment.

RESULTSAlthough 66% of subjects had PV expansion, only 37% were hypervolemic (TBV >10% excess). True anemia (RBCV ≥10% deficit) was present in 62% of subjects. Treatment of true anemia without hypervolemia resulted in a rise in peripheral Hct of 2.7 ± 2.9% (p < 0.001), and diuretic treatment of hypervolemia in cases without anemia caused a 4.5 ± 3.9% (p < 0.001) increase in peripheral Hct at 11.3 ± 7.5 days after admission. Subjects had lower 30-day rates of readmission (12.2% vs. 27.7%, respectively; p < 0.001), of 30-day mortality (2.0% vs. 11.1%, respectively; p < 0.001), and of 365-day mortality (4.9% vs. 35.5%, respectively; p < 0.001) but longer lengths of stay (7.3 vs. 5.6 days, respectively; p < 0.001) than control subjects.

CONCLUSIONSRetrospective outcomes using volume-guided HF therapy versus propensity-matched controls support the benefit of BVA in guiding volume management and reducing death and rehospitalization due to HF.

Copyright © 2018 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.