CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
English

科学研究

科研文章

荐读文献

Physiologic Characteristics and Clinical Outcomes of Patients With Discordance Between FFR and iFR Relationship between fractional flow reserve value and the amount of subtended myocardium EHRA/EAPCI expert consensus statement on catheter-based left atrial appendage occlusion – an update Impact of myocardial supply area on the transstenotic hemodynamics as determined by fractional flow reserve Gut microbiota induces high platelet response in patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction after ticagrelor treatment Prognostic Implication of Thermodilution Coronary Flow Reserve in Patients Undergoing Fractional Flow Reserve Measurement Bosentan therapy in patients with Eisenmenger syndrome: a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study Predictors of Left Main Coronary Artery Disease in the ISCHEMIA Trial Optical coherence tomography and C-reactive protein in risk stratification of acute coronary syndromes Validation of bifurcation DEFINITION criteria and comparison of stenting strategies in true left main bifurcation lesions

Clinical TrialVolume 11, Issue 23, December 2018

JOURNAL:JACC Cardiovasc Interv. Article Link

Comparison of 2 Different Drug-Coated Balloons in In-Stent Restenosis: The RESTORE ISR China Randomized Trial

YD Chen, L Gao, Q Qin et al. Keywords: drug-coated balloon; drug-eluting stent(s); in-segment late loss; in-stent restenosis

ABSTRACT


OBJECTIVES - The aim of the present study was to evaluate the angiographic efficacy, clinical safety, and effectiveness of the Restore paclitaxel-coated balloon in a randomized trial designed to enable the approval of the new device in China.

 

BACKGROUND - Drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty offers an effective treatment for in-stent restenosis. Restore is a new DCB with a SAFEPAX shellac-ammonium salt excipient that can avoid drug washing off during catheter delivery to the target lesion site.

 

METHODS -  In the noninferiority RESTORE ISR China (Compare the Efficacy and Safety of RESTORE DEB and SeQuent Please in Chinese Patient With Coronary In-stent Restenosis) trial, eligible patients with first occurrence of drug-eluting stent ISR were randomized to the Restore DCB or SeQuent Please DCB in a 1:1 ratio stratified by diabetes. Angiographic and clinical follow-up was planned at 9 months and 1 year, respectively, in all patients. The study was powered for the primary endpoint of 9-month in-segment late loss.

 

RESULTS - Between May 2016 and July 2017, a total of 240 subjects at 12 sites were randomized to either the Restore group (n = 120) or the SeQuent Please group (n = 120). Nine-month in-segment late loss was 0.38 ± 0.50 mm with Restore versus 0.35 ± 0.47 mm with SeQuent Please; the 1-sided 97.5% upper confidence limit of the difference was 0.17 mm, achieving noninferiority of Restore compared with SeQuent Please (p for noninferiority = 0.02). Both DCBs had similar 1-year rates of target lesion failure (13.3% vs. 12.6%; p = 0.87).

 

CONCLUSIONS - In this head-to-head randomized trial, the Restore DCB was noninferior to the SeQuent Please DCB for the primary endpoint of 9-month in-segment late loss. (Compare the Efficacy and Safety of RESTORE DEB and SeQuent Please in Chinese Patient With Coronary In-stent Restenosis; NCT02944890)