CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
English

科学研究

科研文章

荐读文献

The Year in Cardiovascular Medicine 2020: Coronary Intervention Utilization and programming of an automatic MRI recognition feature for cardiac rhythm management devices SGLT2 Inhibitors in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Meta-Analysis of the EMPEROR-Reduced and DAPA-HF Trials Home-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation: A Scientific Statement From the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation, the American Heart Association, and the American College of Cardiology Prevention of Bleeding in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing PCI Treating Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Why, How, and When? Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Mortality in Healthy Men and Women Classification of Deaths in Cardiovascular Outcomes Trials Known Unknowns and Unknown Unknowns Cholesterol-Lowering Agents The Current State of Left Main Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
|<<... 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 ...>>|

Original Research2018 Nov 15;92(6):E416-E424.

JOURNAL：Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. Article Link

Long-term outcomes after treatment of bare-metal stent restenosis with paclitaxel-coated balloon catheters or everolimus-eluting stents: 3-year follow-up of the TIS clinical study

Pleva L, Kukla P, Zapletalova J et al. Keywords: everolimus-eluting stent; in-stent restenosis; paclitaxel-eluting balloon

ABSTRACT



BACKGROUND - The efficacy of paclitaxel-eluting balloon catheters (PEB) and drug-eluting stents for treatment of bare-metal stent restenosis (BMS-ISR) have been demonstrated in several studies with follow-up times of 9 to 12 months; however, the long-term outcomes of ISR treatment are less defined.


OBJECTIVES - We aimed to compare the long-term efficacy of PEB and everolimus-eluting stents (EES) for the treatment of BMS-ISR.


METHODS - We analyzed 3-year clinical follow-up data from patients included in the TIS randomized clinical study. A total of 136 patients with BMS-ISR were allocated to receive treatment with either PEB or EES (68 patients with 74 ISR lesions per group).


RESULTS - The PEB and EES groups did not significantly differ in major adverse cardiac events-free survival (MACE; P = .211; including individual events: CV death: P = .622; myocardial infarction: P = .650 or target vessel revascularization: P = .286) at 3-year clinical follow-up. No event-free survival differences were found between the groups regarding overall mortality (P = .818), definite stent thrombosis (P = .165) or the second MACE (P = .270).


CONCLUSIONS - At the 3-year follow-up, no significant differences in clinical outcomes were found between iopromide-coated PEB and EES for the treatment of BMS-ISR. (ClinicalTrials.gov; https://clinicaltrials.gov; NCT01735825).

© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.


>CBS CBS 2019

> CBS 2019

> CBS 2019 注册

> CBS 2019 会议日程

> CBS 2019 学术征集

> CBS 2019 热点

 CBSMD

> CBSMD 网站注册

> 教育中心

> 荐读文献

> Top 10 阅读文献

> 文献导读
CBS 2019 CBS 2019 主席团 教育中心 科研动态
Copyright ⓒ CBS MD Nanjing China. All rights reserved. 京ICP备16025898号-11
联系我们| Top