CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
English

科学研究

科研文章

荐读文献

Heart Failure With Recovered Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction: JACC Scientific Expert Panel Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement in Patients with Heart Failure and Secondary Mitral Regurgitation: From COAPT Trial A Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Cardiac Contractility Modulation Switching of Oral Anticoagulation Therapy After PCI in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: The RE-DUAL PCI Trial Subanalysis Randomized comparison of clinical outcomes between intravascular ultrasound and angiography-guided drug-eluting stent implantation for long coronary artery stenoses Intravascular ultrasound-guided drug-eluting stent implantation: An updated meta-analysis of randomized control trials and observational studies Stage-dependent differential effects of interleukin-1 isoforms on experimental atherosclerosis Provisional versus elective two-stent strategy for unprotected true left main bifurcation lesions: Insights from a FAILS-2 sub-study Outcomes 2 Years After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients at Low Surgical Risk Quality of Life after Everolimus-Eluting Stents or Bypass Surgery for Treatment of Left Main Disease

Clinical Trial2018 Sep 27;379(13):1205-1215.

JOURNAL:N Engl J Med. Article Link

Wearable Cardioverter-Defibrillator after Myocardial Infarction

Olgin JE, Pletcher MJ, VEST Investigators et al. Keywords: wearable cardioverter–defibrillator; myocardial infarction; sudden death prevention

ABSTRACT


BACKGROUND - Despite the high rate of sudden death after myocardial infarction among patients with a low ejection fraction, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators are contraindicated until 40 to 90 days after myocardial infarction. Whether a wearable cardioverter-defibrillator would reduce the incidence of sudden death during this high-risk period is unclear.


METHODS - We randomly assigned (in a 2:1 ratio) patients with acute myocardial infarction and an ejection fraction of 35% or less to receive a wearable cardioverter-defibrillator plus guideline-directed therapy (the device group) or to receive only guideline-directed therapy (the control group). The primary outcome was the composite of sudden death or death from ventricular tachy arrhythmia at 90 days (arrhythmic death). Secondary outcomes included death from any cause and nonarrhythmic death.


RESULTS - Of 2302 participants, 1524 were randomly assigned to the device group and 778 to the control group. Participants in the device group wore the device for a median of 18.0 hours per day (interquartile range, 3.8 to 22.7). Arrhythmic death occurred in 1.6% of the participants in the device group and in 2.4% of those in the control group (relative risk, 0.67; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.37 to 1.21; P=0.18). Death from any cause occurred in 3.1% of the participants in the device group and in 4.9% of those in the control group (relative risk, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.98; uncorrected P=0.04), and nonarrhythmic death in 1.4% and 2.2%, respectively (relative risk, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.33 to 1.19; uncorrected P=0.15). Of the 48 participants in the device group who died, 12 were wearing the device at the time of death. A total of 20 participants in the device group (1.3%) received an appropriate shock, and 9 (0.6%) received an inappropriate shock.


CONCLUSIONS - Among patients with a recent myocardial infarction and an ejection fraction of 35% or less, the wearable cardioverter-defibrillator did not lead to a significantly lower rate of the primary outcome of arrhythmic death than control. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health and Zoll Medical; VEST ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01446965 .).