CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
English

科学研究

科研文章

荐读文献

New AHA/ACC/HRS Guidance on Sudden Cardiac Death Prevention Multivessel PCI Guided by FFR or Angiography for Myocardial Infarction Know Diabetes by Heart: A Partnership to Improve Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Open sesame technique in percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction Deficiency of GATA3-Positive Macrophages Improves Cardiac Function Following Myocardial Infarction or Pressure Overload Hypertrophy Lack of Association Between Heart Failure and Incident Cancer Fractional flow reserve vs. angiography in guiding management to optimize outcomes in non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: the British Heart Foundation FAMOUS-NSTEMI randomized trial Imaging Coronary Anatomy and Reducing Myocardial Infarction High-Sensitivity Troponin and The Application of Risk Stratification Thresholds in Patients with Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome Optimal medical therapy vs. coronary revascularization for patients presenting with chronic total occlusion: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and propensity score adjusted studies

Clinical Trial2017 Dec 1;248:92-96 [Epub 2017 Aug 18]

JOURNAL:Int J Cardiol. Article Link

Anatomical plaque and vessel characteristics are associated with hemodynamic indices including fractional flow reserve and coronary flow reserve: A prospective exploratory intravascular ultrasound analysis

Brown AJ, Giblett JP, Hoole SP et al. Keywords: Coronary artery disease; Coronary flow reserve; Coronary physiology; Fractional flow reserve; Intravascular ultrasound

ABSTRACT


OBJECTIVES - To assess the relationship between anatomical form and physiological function in atherosclerotic coronary arteries.


BACKGROUND - Although adverse cardiovascular events are predicted by plaque morphology or invasively-derived hemodynamic indices, the link between these important prognostic measures remains unexplored.


METHODS - Patients with stable angina underwent fractional flow reserve (FFR), coronary flow reserve (CFR), pressure-derived collateral flow index (CFIp), trans-myocardial biomarker sampling and radiofrequency intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) imaging prior to intervention. Physiological ischemia was defined as either FFR≤0.8 or CFR<2.0.


RESULTS - Mean FFR was 0.70±0.15 and CFR was 2.1±1.3, with 68/92 lesions having FFR≤0.8 and 61/92 having CFR<2.0. On IVUS, FFR≤0.8 lesions had reduced minimal luminal area (MLA, p=0.03), increased plaqueburden (PB, p=0.04) and volume (p=0.01). There was no relationship between FFR and IVUS-defined plaque composition. FFR≤0.8 was observed in 75.3%, 72.4% and 70.4% of lesions with MLA≤4mm2, PB≥70% and thin-cap fibroatheroma, respectively. Multivariate regression demonstrated FFR≤0.8 was independently predicted by MLA (odds ratio (OR) 0.53, 95% CI 0.29-0.97, p=0.04) and PB (OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.01-1.21, p=0.03). There were no identifiable relationships between plaque structure and CFR or CFIp. CFR<2.0 was associated with whole vessel necrotic core increases (p=0.047), fibrofatty tissue reduction (p=0.004) and elevated baseline transmyocardial high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) gradients (p=0.02).


CONCLUSIONS - Measures of plaque structure including PB and MLA are independently associated with FFR, but not with CFR or CFIp. Instead, vessels with low CFR have increased lipid accumulation and a higher transmyocardial hsCRP gradient. These results may explain similarities in clinical outcomes between physiologically and anatomically orientated trials.