CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
English

科学研究

科研文章

荐读文献

Hospital Readmission After Perioperative Acute Myocardial Infarction Associated With Noncardiac Surgery The (R)Evolution of the CICU - Better for the Patient, Better for Education Canadian SCAD Cohort Study: Shedding Light on SCAD From a United Front Selection of stenting approach for coronary bifurcation lesions Decreased inspired oxygen stimulates de novo formation of coronary collaterals in adult heart Update in the Percutaneous Management of Coronary Chronic Total Occlusions BMI, Infarct Size, and Clinical Outcomes Following Primary PCI Patient-Level Analysis From 6 Randomized Trials Clinical Practice Guideline for Screening and Management of High Blood Pressure in Children and Adolescents Association of the PHACTR1/EDN1 Genetic Locus With Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection Reappraisal of Reported Genes for Sudden Arrhythmic Death: An Evidence-Based Evaluation of Gene Validity for Brugada Syndrome

Review Article2018 Oct 16;72(16):1972-1980.

JOURNAL:J Am Coll Cardiol. Article Link

Cardiac Shock Care Centers: JACC Review Topic of the Week

Rab T, Ratanapo S, Kern KB et al. Keywords: cardiogenic shock; care pathway; shock center

ABSTRACT

Despite advances over the past decade, the incidence of cardiogenic shock secondary to acute myocardial infarction has increased, with an unchanged mortality near 50%. Recent trials have not clarified the best strategies in treatment. While dedicated cardiac shock centers are being established, there are no standardized agreements on the utilization of mechanical circulatory support and the timeliness of percutaneous coronary intervention strategies. In some centers and prospective registries, outcomes after placement of advanced mechanical circulatory support prior to reperfusion therapy with percutaneous coronary intervention have been encouraging with improved survival. Here, we suggest systems of care with a treatment pathway for patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.