CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
English

科学研究

科研文章

荐读文献

Suture- or Plug-Based Large-Bore Arteriotomy Closure: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial Modifiable lifestyle factors and heart failure: A Mendelian randomization study In-stent neoatherosclerosis: a final common pathway of late stent failure Long-Term Outcomes of Anticoagulation for Bioprosthetic Valve Thrombosis Heart Failure and Atrial Fibrillation, Like Fire and Fury Sequence variations in PCSK9, low LDL, and protection against coronary heart disease Incidence and Outcomes of Surgical Bailout During TAVR : Insights From the STS/ACC TVT Registry Dilated cardiomyopathy: so many cardiomyopathies! Empagliflozin Increases Cardiac Energy Production in Diabetes - Novel Translational Insights Into the Heart Failure Benefits of SGLT2 Inhibitors The prevalence and importance of frailty in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction - an analysis of PARADIGM-HF and ATMOSPHERE

Review Article2018 Oct 16;72(16):1972-1980.

JOURNAL:J Am Coll Cardiol. Article Link

Cardiac Shock Care Centers: JACC Review Topic of the Week

Rab T, Ratanapo S, Kern KB et al. Keywords: cardiogenic shock; care pathway; shock center

ABSTRACT

Despite advances over the past decade, the incidence of cardiogenic shock secondary to acute myocardial infarction has increased, with an unchanged mortality near 50%. Recent trials have not clarified the best strategies in treatment. While dedicated cardiac shock centers are being established, there are no standardized agreements on the utilization of mechanical circulatory support and the timeliness of percutaneous coronary intervention strategies. In some centers and prospective registries, outcomes after placement of advanced mechanical circulatory support prior to reperfusion therapy with percutaneous coronary intervention have been encouraging with improved survival. Here, we suggest systems of care with a treatment pathway for patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.