CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
English

科学研究

科研文章

荐读文献

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Vulnerable Coronary Atherosclerotic Plaque Primary Prevention Trial Designs Using Coronary Imaging: A National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Workshop Anticoagulation in Concomitant Chronic Kidney Disease and Atrial Fibrillation: JACC Review Topic of the Week The Utility of Rapid Atrial Pacing Immediately Post-TAVR to Predict the Need for Pacemaker Implantation Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement During Pregnancy Provisional versus elective two-stent strategy for unprotected true left main bifurcation lesions: Insights from a FAILS-2 sub-study Risk Stratification in PAH Cardiovascular Events Associated With SGLT-2 Inhibitors Versus Other Glucose-Lowering Drugs: The CVD-REAL 2 Study Comprehensive intravascular ultrasound assessment of stent area and its impact on restenosis and adverse cardiac events in 403 patients with unprotected left main disease Management of Antithrombotic Therapy in Atrial Fibrillation Patients Undergoing PCI: JACC State-of-the-Art Review

Original Research2018 Dec 20;14(12):e1295-e1303.

JOURNAL:EuroIntervention. Article Link

Device specificity of vascular healing following implantation of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds and bioabsorbable polymer metallic drug-eluting stents in human coronary arteries: the ESTROFA OCT BVS vs. BP-DES study

de la Torre Hernandez JM, Gonzalo N, Otaegui I et al. Keywords: BVS vs. BP-DES; OCT; vascular healing

ABSTRACT

AIMS - We sought to compare vascular healing with bioresorbable everolimus-eluting vascular scaffolds (BVS) and drug-eluting stents with bioabsorbable polymers (BP-DES) at six and 12 months both implanted in the same patients.

 

METHODS AND RESULTS - This was a multicentre and prospective study including patients with at least two comparable lesions to treat. In every patient both BVS and BP-DES (SYNERGY, Orsiro or BioMatrix Flex) were implanted by lesion randomisation. Patients included were evaluated with optical coherence tomography at six or 12 months (2:1). Finally, 68 patients had an examination at six months and 27 patients at 12 months. The rates of uncovered struts at six months were 1.7±3.2% for BVS and 5.3±5.6% for BP-DES (p=0.0001), and at 12 months 0.48±0.72% and 4.8±5%, respectively (p=0.001). Rates of strut malapposition were significantly lower with BVS. There was no significant intra-patient correlation with BP-DES/BVS for endpoints. Evaginations were more frequent and larger with BVS. Discontinuities in BVS were observed in 19.4% at six months and 14.3% at 12 months.

 

CONCLUSIONS - Vascular healing with BVS and BP-DES could be more device-specific than patient-specific. At follow-up, BVS presented fewer uncovered or non-apposed struts than BP-DES but more frequent and larger evaginations. Discontinuities in BVS were relatively frequent at both time points.