CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
English

科学研究

科研文章

荐读文献

Clinical Outcomes Following Intravascular Imaging-Guided Versus Coronary Angiography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Stent Implantation: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis of 31 Studies and 17,882 Patients Right ventricular function and outcome in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement Revascularization in Patients With Left Main Coronary Artery Disease and Left Ventricular Dysfunction Rationale and design of a randomized clinical trial comparing safety and efficacy of Myval transcatheter heart valve versus contemporary transcatheter heart valves in patients with severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis: the LANDMARK trial Post-stenting fractional flow reserve vs coronary angiography for optimisation of percutaneous coronary intervention: TARGET-FFR trial Comparison of Early Surgical or Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Conservative Management in Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis Using Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting: Results From the TOPAS Prospective Observational Cohort Study Correlations between fractional flow reserve and intravascular ultrasound in patients with an ambiguous left main coronary artery stenosis Coronary Access After TAVR With a Self-Expanding Bioprosthesis: Insights From Computed Tomography Complex PCI procedures: challenges for the interventional cardiologist Stroke Rates Following Surgical Versus Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization

Review Article2017 Jul;14(7):841-850

JOURNAL:Expert Opin Drug Deliv. Article Link

Drug-eluting balloons in coronary interventions: the quiet revolution?

Alfonso F, García-Guimaraes M, Navarrete G et al. Keywords: drug-eluting balloon; extended release; in-stent restenosis; porous angioplasty balloon; sirolimus nanoparticle

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION - Drug-eluting balloons (DEB) may be considered as a 'quiet revolution' in percutaneous coronary interventions. Early-generation DEB eluting paclitaxel proved to be very effective in animal models to reduce neointimal hyperplasia. Areas covered: Review of DEB efficacy in patients with coronary de novo lesions and in-stent restenosis (ISR). Expert opinion: Many randomized clinical trials and meta-analyses have demonstrated the value of DEB in patients with ISR. In this setting, DEB are safe and effective with clinical and angiographic results superior to plain balloon angioplasty and at least equivalent to first generation drug-eluting stents (DES). In selected 'de novo' lesions (bifurcation lesions, small vessels, diffuse disease, myocardial infarction) DEB represent an attractive alternative although additional evidence in these 'niche' indications is still required before a widespread clinical utilization can be recommended. Recently, new generation DEB have become available, offering interesting new possibilities (paclitaxel and also sirolimus) for coronary interventions. Further studies are required to compare the results of novel generation DEB with those of second-generation DES.