CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
English

科学研究

科研文章

荐读文献

The Science Underlying COVID-19: Implications for the Cardiovascular System Efficacy and safety of low-dose colchicine in patients with coronary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials Association Between Depressive Symptoms and Incident Cardiovascular Diseases Impact of Percutaneous Revascularization on Exercise Hemodynamics in Patients With Stable Coronary Disease Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in elective percutaneous coronary intervention (ALPHEUS): a randomised, open-label, phase 3b trial Antibody-Based Ticagrelor Reversal Agent in Healthy Volunteers When, where, and how to target vascular inflammation in the post-CANTOS era? Comparison of 1-month Versus 12-month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy after Implantation of Drug-eluting Stents Guided by either Intravascular Ultrasound or Angiography in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome: Rationale and Design of Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled IVUS-ACS & ULTIMATE-DAPT trial Left atrial appendage occlusion in atrial fibrillation patients with previous intracranial bleeding: A national multicenter study Safety and efficacy of the bioabsorbable polymer everolimus-eluting stent versus durable polymer drug-eluting stents in high-risk patients undergoing PCI: TWILIGHT-SYNERGY

Original Research2017 Dec 1;120(11):1920-1925

JOURNAL:Am J Cardiol. Article Link

Comparison of Accuracy of One-Use Methods for Calculating Fractional Flow Reserve by Intravascular Optical Coherence Tomography to That Determined by the Pressure-Wire Method

Jang SJ, Ahn JM, Oh WY et al. Keywords: Calculating Fractional Flow Reserve; Intravascular Optical Coherence Tomography; Pressure-Wire Method

ABSTRACT

Although the identification of the hemodynamic significance of coronary lesions becomes important for revascularization strategy, the potential role of 3-dimensional high-resolution intracoronary optical coherence tomography (OCT) for predicting functional significance of coronary lesions remains unclear. We assessed the diagnostic performance of 2 computational approaches for deriving fractional flow reserve (FFR) from intravascular OCT images. We developed 2 methods to derive FFR-OCT by AFD (FFR-OCTAFD) and FFR-OCT by CFD (FFR-OCTCFD). Among 217 eligible patients between 2011 and 2014, 104 were included for data analysis (9 for derivation, 95 for validation). Luminal geometries from 3-dimensional OCT were used for both FFR-OCTAFD and FFR-OCTCFD calculations. The analytical fluid dynamics method calculated FFR from the blood flow resistance estimated using Poiseuille's law. For computational fluid dynamics, we numerically solved the Navier-Stokes equation in a steady-state flow with the distal porous media model for the capillary vessels. We examined the diagnostic performance of FFR-OCTAFD and FFR-OCTCFD compared with the pressure-wire measured FFR. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 86%, 65%, 94%, 81%, and 88% for FFR-OCTAFD and 86%, 73%, 91%, 76%, and 90% for FFR-OCTCFD. The area under the curve of the receiver-operating characteristic curve was 0.88 for FFR-OCTAFD and 0.86 for FFR-OCTCFD. FFR-OCTAFD and FFR-OCTCFD showed a strong linear correlation with the measured FFR (r = 0.631; p <0.001, r = 0.655; p <0.001, respectively). FFR derived from high-resolution volumetric OCT images showed high diagnostic performance for the detection of coronary ischemia. In conclusion, OCT-derived FFR may be useful for guiding the management of coronary artery disease.


Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.