CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
English

科学研究

科研文章

荐读文献

Percutaneous coronary intervention for the left main stem and other bifurcation lesions: 12th consensus document from the European Bifurcation Club Minimum Core Data Elements for Evaluation of TAVR: A Scientific Statement by PASSION CV, HVC, and TVT Registry CD163+ macrophages promote angiogenesis and vascular permeability accompanied by inflammation in atherosclerosis A prospective, randomized, open-label trial of 6-month versus 12-month dual antiplatelet therapy after drug-eluting stent implantation in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: Rationale and design of the Revascularization of left main coronary artery Potential Mechanisms of In-stent Neointimal Atherosclerotic Plaque Formation Acute Coronary Syndrome, Antiplatelet Therapy, and Bleeding: A Clinical Perspective Contemporary prevalence of pulmonary arterial hypertension in adult congenital heart disease following the updated clinical classification Antibody-Based Ticagrelor Reversal Agent in Healthy Volunteers Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in elective percutaneous coronary intervention (ALPHEUS): a randomised, open-label, phase 3b trial

Original ResearchVolume 12, Issue 9, May 2019

JOURNAL:JACC Cardiovasc Interv. Article Link

5-Year Outcomes According to FFR of Left Circumflex Coronary Artery After Left Main Crossover Stenting

CH Lee, S-W Choi, JM Hwang et al. Keywords: left main stenting; outcome; FFR; Lcx

ABSTRACT

Objectives The aim of the current study was to evaluate the long-term clinical impact of fractional flow reserve (FFR) in jailed left circumflex coronary artery (LCx) after left main coronary artery (LM) simple crossover stenting.

Background Although the provisional side-branch intervention with FFR guidance has been validated for non-LM bifurcation lesions, the outcome of such a strategy in LM bifurcation disease is not well-known.

Methods Patients who underwent LM-to–left anterior descending coronary artery simple crossover stenting and who had FFR measurements in the LCx thereafter were enrolled. A low FFR was defined as ≤0.80. The clinical outcomes were assessed by the 5-year rate of target lesion failure (TLF) (a composite of cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction, or target lesion revascularization).

Results In 83 patients, the mean FFR of the LCx after LM stenting was 0.87 ± 0.08, and 14 patients (16.9%) had a low FFR. There was no correlation between the FFR and angiographic % diameter stenosis in jailed LCx (R2 = 0.039; p = 0.071) and there was no difference in the angiographic % diameter stenosis in the high and low FFR groups. At 5 years, the low FFR group had a significantly higher rate of TLF than the high FFR group (33.4% vs. 10.7%; hazard ratio: 4.09, 95% confidence interval: 1.15 to 14.52; p = 0.029). However, there was no difference in the clinical outcomes according to the angiographic % diameter stenosis. In a multivariate analysis, a low FFR was an independent predictor of the risk for a 5-year TLF (hazard ratio: 6.49; 95% confidence interval: 1.37 to 30.73; p = 0.018).


Conclusions The patients with a high FFR in jailed LCx had better 5-year outcomes than those with a low FFR. The FFR measurement in jailed LCx can be helpful in selecting an adequate treatment strategy and may reduce unnecessary complex procedures.

简单支架技术横跨技术(crossover)

jailed Lcx 拘禁回旋支