CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
English

科学研究

科研文章

荐读文献

Contemporary use of drug-coated balloons in coronary artery disease: Where are we now? The performance of non-invasive tests to rule-in and rule-out significant coronary artery stenosis in patients with stable angina: a meta-analysis focused on post-test disease probability Multimodality imaging in cardiology: a statement on behalf of the Task Force on Multimodality Imaging of the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging A prospective natural-history study of coronary atherosclerosis Treating Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Why, How, and When? The Year in Cardiovascular Medicine 2020: Coronary Intervention Comparison of Heart Team vs Interventional Cardiologist Recommendations for the Treatment of Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease Cardiovascular Risk Reduction with Icosapent Ethyl for Hypertriglyceridemia Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Interventional Cardiology: From Decision-Making Aid to Advanced Interventional Procedure Assistance Level of Scientific Evidence Underlying the Current American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Clinical Practice Guidelines

Original ResearchVolume 12, Issue 10, May 2019

JOURNAL:JACC Cardiovasc Interv. Article Link

Dual-Antiplatelet Therapy Cessation and Cardiovascular Risk in Relation to Age: Analysis From the PARIS Registry

Joyce LC, Baber U, Mehran R et al. Keywords: DAPT; therapy cessation; PCI; age

ABSTRACT


OBJECTIVES- The aim of this study was to examine the association between dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) cessation and cardiovascular risk after percutaneous coronary intervention in relation to age.

 

BACKGROUND - Examination of outcomes by age after percutaneous coronary intervention is relevant given the aging population.

 

METHODS- Two-year clinical outcomes, incidence, and effect of DAPT cessation on outcomes were compared by ages 55, 56 to 74, and 75 years from the PARIS (Patterns of Non-Adherence to Antiplatelet Regimens in Stented Patients) registry. DAPT cessation included physician-recommended discontinuation, interruption for surgery, and disruption (from noncompliance or bleeding). Clinical endpoints were major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (a composite of cardiac death, definite or probable stent thrombosis, spontaneous myocardial infarction, or clinically indicated target lesion revascularization), a secondary restrictive definition of MACE (MACE2) excluding target lesion revascularization, and bleeding.

 

RESULTS - A total of 1,192 patients (24%) were 55 years, 2,869 (57%) were 56 to 74 years, and 957 (19%) were 75 years of age. Patients 75 years of age had higher DAPT cessation rates and increased risk for MACE2, death, cardiac death, and bleeding compared with younger patients. Discontinuation and interruption were not associated with increased cardiovascular risk across age groups, whereas disruption was associated with increased risk for MACE and MACE2 in younger patients but not in patients 75 years of age (p for trend <0.05).

 

CONCLUSIONS- Nonadherence and outcomes vary by age, with patients 75 years having the highest DAPT cessation rates. We observed no association between outcomes and DAPT cessation in patients 75 years, whereas discontinuation was associated with lower MACE rates and disruption with increased MACE rates in patients <75 years.