CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
English

科学研究

科研文章

荐读文献

Quantitative angiography methods for bifurcation lesions: a consensus statement update from the European Bifurcation Club IVUS Guidance Is Associated With Better Outcome in Patients Undergoing Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Stenting Compared With Angiography Guidance Alone Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction During the COVID-19 Pandemic From Nonclinical Research to Clinical Trials and Patient-registries: Challenges and Opportunities in Biomedical Research High-Risk Coronary Atherosclerosis: Is It the Plaque Burden, the Calcium, the Lipid, or Something Else? HFpEF: From Mechanisms to Therapies Prognostic Effect and Longitudinal Hemodynamic Assessment of Borderline Pulmonary Hypertension Current Interventions for the Left Main Bifurcation Comparative analysis of recurrent events after presentation with an index myocardial infarction or ischaemic stroke Antithrombotic Therapy in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Acute Coronary Syndrome Treated Medically or with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention or Undergoing Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights from the AUGUSTUS Trial

Original ResearchVolume 74, Issue 3, July 2019

JOURNAL:J Am Coll Cardiol. Article Link

Myocardial Infarction Risk Stratification With a Single Measurement of High-Sensitivity Troponin I

Y Sandoval, R Nowak, CR deFilippi et al. Keywords: acute myocardial infarction; high-sensitivity cardiac troponin; risk stratification; troponin

ABSTRACT


BACKGROUND- Limited data exist on rapid risk-stratification strategies using the U.S. Food and Drug Administrationcleared high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) assays.

 

OBJECTIVES- This study sought to examine single measurement hs-cTnI to identify patients at low and high risk for acute myocardial infarction (MI).

 

METHODS- This was a prospective, multicenter, observational study of patients with suspected acute MI enrolled across 29 U.S. sites with hs-cTnI measured using the Atellica IM TnIH and ADVIA Centaur TNIH (Siemens Healthineers) assays. To identify low-risk patients, sensitivities and negative predictive values (NPVs) for acute MI and MI or death at 30 days were examined across baseline hs-cTnI concentrations. To identify high-risk patients, positive predictive values and specificities for acute MI were evaluated.

 

RESULTS- Among 2,212 patients, acute MI occurred in 12%. The limits of detection or quantitation resulted in excellent sensitivities (range 98.6% to 99.6%) and NPVs (range 99.5% to 99.8%) for acute MI or death at 30 days across both assays. An optimized threshold of <5 ng/l identified almost one-half of all patients as low risk, with sensitivities of 98.6% (95% confidence interval: 97.2% to 100%) and NPVs of 99.6% (95% confidence interval: 99.2% to 99.9%) for acute MI or death at 30 days across both assays. For high-risk patients, hs-cTnI 120 ng/l resulted in positive predictive values for acute MI of 70%.

 

CONCLUSIONS- Recognizing the continuous relationship between baseline hs-cTnI and risk for adverse events, using 2 Food and Drug Administrationcleared hs-cTnI assays, an optimized threshold of <5 ng/l safely identified almost one-half of all patients as low risk at presentation, with hs-cTnI 120 ng/l identifying high-risk patients.