CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
English

科学研究

科研文章

荐读文献

Circulating MicroRNAs and Monocyte-Platelet Aggregate Formation in Acute Coronary Syndrome Evaluation and Management of Nonculprit Lesions in STEMI Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Acute Coronary Syndromes: From Pathogenesis to the Fine Line Between Bleeding and Ischemic Risk Major trials in coronary intervention from 2018 Association Between Collateral Circulation and Myocardial Viability Evaluated by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Coronary Artery Chronic Total Occlusion Use of Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices Among Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock Early versus delayed invasive intervention in acute coronary syndromes Epinephrine Versus Norepinephrine for Cardiogenic Shock After Acute Myocardial Infarction Risk Factors Associated With Major Cardiovascular Events 1 Year After Acute Myocardial Infarction Management of Myocardial Revascularization Failure: An Expert Consensus Document of the EAPCI

Original Research2019; 381:243-251

JOURNAL:N Engl J Med. Article Link

Effect of Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure on Cardiovascular Outcomes

AC Flint, C Conell, DL Bhatt et al. Keywords: hypertension; systolic blood pressure; diastolic blood pressure; multivariable Cox survival analysis; MACE

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND - The relationship between outpatient systolic and diastolic blood pressure and cardiovascular outcomes remains unclear and has been complicated by recently revised guidelines with two different thresholds (140/90 mm Hg and 130/80 mm Hg) for treating hypertension.


METHODS - Using data from 1.3 million adults in a general outpatient population, we performed a multivariable Cox survival analysis to determine the effect of the burden of systolic and diastolic hypertension on a composite outcome of myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, or hemorrhagic stroke over a period of 8 years. The analysis controlled for demographic characteristics and coexisting conditions.


RESULTS - The burdens of systolic and diastolic hypertension each independently predicted adverse outcomes. In survival models, a continuous burden of systolic hypertension (140 mm Hg; hazard ratio per unit increase in z score, 1.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.17 to 1.18) and diastolic hypertension (90 mm Hg; hazard ratio per unit increase in z score, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.06 to 1.07) independently predicted the composite outcome. Similar results were observed with the lower threshold of hypertension (130/80 mm Hg) and with systolic and diastolic blood pressures used as predictors without hypertension thresholds. A J-curve relation between diastolic blood pressure and outcomes was seen that was explained at least in part by age and other covariates and by a higher effect of systolic hypertension among persons in the lowest quartile of diastolic blood pressure.