CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
English

科学研究

科研文章

荐读文献

A VOYAGER Meta-Analysis of the Impact of Statin Therapy on Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Triglyceride Levels in Patients With Hypertriglyceridemia European Bifurcation Club White Paper on Stenting Techniques for Patients With Bifurcated Coronary Artery Lesions Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction COVID-19 and Thrombotic or Thromboembolic Disease: Implications for Prevention, Antithrombotic Therapy, and Follow-up Hemodynamic Response to Nitroprusside in Patients With Low-Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis and Preserved Ejection Fraction Dynamic atrioventricular delay programming improves ventricular electrical synchronization as evaluated by 3D vectorcardiography The Prognostic Value of Exercise Echocardiography After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Basic Biology of Oxidative Stress and the Cardiovascular System: Part 1 of a 3-Part Series 2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure Discharge Against Medical Advice After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the United States

Clinical TrialSeptember 28, 2019

JOURNAL:N Engl J Med. Article Link

Five-Year Outcomes after PCI or CABG for Left Main Coronary Disease

Stone GW, Kappetein AP, EXCEL Trial Investigators. Keywords: left main coronary artery disease; low or intermediate anatomical complexity; PCI vs CABG; 5 year outcome

ABSTRACT


BACKGROUND - Long-term outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with contemporary drug-eluting stents, as compared with coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG), in patients with left main coronary artery disease are not clearly established.


METHODS - We randomly assigned 1905 patients with left main coronary artery disease of low or intermediate anatomical complexity (according to assessment at the participating centers) to undergo either PCI with fluoropolymer-based cobaltchromium everolimus-eluting stents (PCI group, 948 patients) or CABG (CABG group, 957 patients). The primary outcome was a composite of death, stroke, or myocardial infarction.


RESULTS - At 5 years, a primary outcome event had occurred in 22.0% of the patients in the PCI group and in 19.2% of the patients in the CABG group (difference, 2.8 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.9 to 6.5; P=0.13). Death from any cause occurred more frequently in the PCI group than in the CABG group (in 13.0% vs. 9.9%; difference, 3.1 percentage points; 95% CI, 0.2 to 6.1). In the PCI and CABG groups, the incidences of definite cardiovascular death (5.0% and 4.5%, respectively; difference, 0.5 percentage points; 95% CI, 1.4 to 2.5) and myocardial infarction (10.6% and 9.1%; difference, 1.4 percentage points; 95% CI, 1.3 to 4.2) were not significantly different. All cerebrovascular events were less frequent after PCI than after CABG (3.3% vs. 5.2%; difference, 1.9 percentage points; 95% CI, 3.8 to 0), although the incidence of stroke was not significantly different between the two groups (2.9% and 3.7%; difference, 0.8 percentage points; 95% CI, 2.4 to 0.9). Ischemia-driven revascularization was more frequent after PCI than after CABG (16.9% vs. 10.0%; difference, 6.9 percentage points; 95% CI, 3.7 to 10.0).


CONCLUSIONS - In patients with left main coronary artery disease of low or intermediate anatomical complexity, there was no significant difference between PCI and CABG with respect to the rate of the composite outcome of death, stroke, or myocardial infarction at 5 years. (Funded by Abbott Vascular; EXCEL ClinicalTrials.gov number,NCT01205776.)