CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
English

科学研究

科研文章

荐读文献

Hemodynamic, Functional, and Clinical Responses to Pulmonary Artery Denervation in Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension of Different Causes Evolving insights into the role of local shear stress in late stent failure from neoatherosclerosis formation and plaque destabilization Management and outcomes of patients with left atrial appendage thrombus prior to percutaneous closure Rivaroxaban for Thromboprophylaxis in High-Risk Ambulatory Patients With Cancer Long-Term Outcomes of Patients With Mediastinal Radiation–Associated Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing Coronary Revascularization With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Systematic Review and Network Meta‐Analysis Comparing Bifurcation Techniques for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention 2015 ACC/HRS/SCAI Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Device Societal Overview Implications of the local hemodynamic forces on the formation and destabilization of neoatherosclerotic lesions Transseptal puncture versus patent foramen ovale or atrial septal defect access for left atrial appendage closure Alcohol consumption, cardiac biomarkers, and risk of atrial fibrillation and adverse outcomes

Review Article2019 Oct 24. [Epub ahead of print]

JOURNAL:Lancet. Article Link

Comprehensive comparative effectiveness and safety of first-line antihypertensive drug classes: a systematic, multinational, large-scale analysis

Suchard MA, Schuemie MJ, Krumholz HM et al. Keywords: first-line antihypertensive drug; effectiveness; safety

ABSTRACT


BACKGROUND - Uncertainty remains about the optimal monotherapy for hypertension, with current guidelines recommending any primary agent among the first-line drug classes thiazide or thiazide-like diuretics, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers, and non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers, in the absence of comorbid indications. Randomised trials have not further refined this choice.

 

METHODS - We developed a comprehensive framework for real-world evidence that enablescomparativeeffectivenessandsafetyevaluation across many drugs and outcomes from observational data encompassing millions of patients, while minimising inherent bias. Using this framework, we did asystematic,large-scale study under a new-user cohort design to estimate the relative risks of three primary (acute myocardial infarction, hospitalisation for heart failure, and stroke) and six secondary effectivenes sand 46safetyoutcomes comparing all first-line classes across a global network of six administrative claims and three electronic health record databases. The framework addressed residual confounding, publication bias, and p-hacking using large-scale propensity adjustment, a large set of control outcomes, and full disclosure of hypotheses tested.

 

FINDINGS - Using 4·9 million patients, we generated 22 000 calibrated, propensity-score-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) comparing all classes and outcomes across databases. Most estimates revealed no effectiveness differences between classes; however, thiazide or thiazide-like diuretics showed better primary effectiveness than angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors: acute myocardial infarction (HR 0·84, 95% CI 0·75-0·95), hospitalisation for heart failure (0·83, 0·74-0·95), and stroke (0·83, 0·74-0·95) risk while on initial treatment.Safetyprofiles also favoured thiazide or thiazide-like diuretics over angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. The non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers were significantly inferior to the other fourclasses.

 

INTERPRETATION - This comprehensive framework introduces a new way of doing observational health-care science at scale. The approach supports equivalence between drug classes for initiating monotherapy for hypertension-in keeping with current guidelines, with the exception of thiazide or thiazide-like diuretics superiority to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and the inferiority of non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers.

 

FUNDING - US National Science Foundation, US National Institutes of Health, Janssen Research & Development, IQVIA, South Korean Ministry of Health & Welfare, Australian National Health and Medical Research Council.

 

Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.