CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
English

科学研究

科研文章

荐读文献

Multivessel Versus Culprit-Vessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Cardiogenic Shock Systems of Care for ST-Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Policy Statement From the American Heart Association 稳定性冠心病诊断与治疗指南 2013 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Treatment of Blood Cholesterol to Reduce Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Risk in Adults: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines Impact of Coronary Lesion Complexity in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: One-Year Outcomes From the Large, Multicentre e-Ultimaster Registry When high‐volume PCI operators in high‐volume hospitals move to lower volume hospitals—Do they still maintain high volume and quality of outcomes? The spectrum of chronic coronary syndromes: genetics, imaging, and management after PCI and CABG Prevalence of Angina Among Primary Care Patients With Coronary Artery Disease Mode of Death in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction Variation in Revascularization Practice and Outcomes in Asymptomatic Stable Ischemic Heart Disease

Clinical TrialVolume 74, Issue 25, December 2019

JOURNAL:J Am Coll Cardiol. Article Link

Long-Term Follow-Up of Complete Versus Lesion-Only Revascularization in STEMI and Multivessel Disease: The CvLPRIT Trial

AH Gershlick, AS Banning, E Parker Keywords: complete revascularization; multivessel disease; myocardial infarction; noninfarct-related lesion; primary percutaneous coronary interventionST-elevation

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND - Randomized trials have shown that complete revascularization in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (MI) with multivessel disease results in lower major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (all-cause death, MI, ischemia-driven revascularization, heart failure).

 

OBJECTIVES- The goal of this study was to determine whether the benefits of complete revascularization are sustained long-term and their impact on hard endpoints.

 

METHODS - CvLPRIT (Complete versus Lesion-only Primary PCI Trial) was a randomized trial of complete inpatient revascularization versus infarct-related artery revascularization only at the index admission. Randomized patients have been followed longer-term. The components of the original primary endpoint were collected from physical and electronic patient records, and from local databases for all readmissions.

 

RESULTS- The median follow-up (achieved in >90% patients) from randomization to first event or last follow-up was 5.6 years (0.0 to 7.3 years). The primary MACE endpoint rate at this time point was 24.0% in the complete revascularization group but 37.7% of the infarct-related arteryonly group (hazard ratio: 0.57; 95% confidence interval: 0.37 to 0.87; p = 0.0079). The composite endpoint of all-cause death/MI was 10.0% in the complete revascularization group versus 18.5% in the infarct-related arteryonly group (hazard ratio: 0.47; 95% confidence interval: 0.25 to 0.89; p = 0.0175). In a landmark analysis (from 12 months to final follow-up), there was no significant difference between MACE, death/MI, and individual components of the primary endpoint.

 

CONCLUSIONS - Long-term follow-up of the CvLPRIT trial shows that the significantly lower rate of MACE in the complete revascularization group, previously seen at 12 months, is sustained to a median of 5.6 years. A significant difference in composite all-cause death/MI favoring the complete revascularization was also observed. (Complete versus Lesion-only Primary PCI Trial; ISRCTN70913605)