CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
English

科学研究

科研文章

荐读文献

Comparison of safety and periprocedural complications of transfemoral aortic valve replacement under local anaesthesia: minimalist versus complete Heart Team Longitudinal Change in Galectin-3 and Incident Cardiovascular Outcomes A Combined Optical Coherence Tomography and Intravascular Ultrasound Study on Plaque Rupture, Plaque Erosion, and Calcified Nodule in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Incidence, Morphologic Characteristics, and Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Heart Failure With Recovered Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction: JACC Scientific Expert Panel Prognostic implications of baseline 6‐min walk test performance in intermediate risk patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement Colchicine Reduces Cardiovascular Events in Chronic Coronary Disease The Evolution of β-Blockers in Coronary Artery Disease and Heart Failure (Part 1/5) Incidence and Outcomes of Surgical Bailout During TAVR : Insights From the STS/ACC TVT Registry Impact of Positive and Negative Lesion Site Remodeling on Clinical Outcomes : Insights From PROSPECT From organic and inorganic phosphates to valvular and vascular calcifications

Original ResearchVolume 12, Issue 24, December 2019

JOURNAL:JACC Cardiovasc Interv. Article Link

Association Between Diastolic Dysfunction and Health Status Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

AO Malik, M Omer, MC Pflederer et al. Keywords: health status; left ventricular diastolic dysfunction; TAVR

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES - The aim of this study was to assess the association of baseline left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) with health status outcomes of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).

 

BACKGROUND - Although LVDD in patients with aortic stenosis is associated with higher mortality after TAVR, it is unknown if it is also associated with health status recovery.

 

METHODS - In a cohort of 304 patients with interpretable echocardiograms, undergoing TAVR, LVDD was categorized at baseline as absent (grade 0), mild (grade 1), moderate (grade 2), or severe (grade 3). Disease-specific health status was assessed using the 12-item Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire overall summary score (KCCQ-OS) at baseline and at 1-month and 12-month follow-up. Association of baseline LVDD with health status at baseline and follow-up after TAVR was assessed using a linear trend test, and association with health status recovery (change in KCCQ-OS) was examined using a linear mixed model adjusting for baseline KCCQ-OS.

 

RESULTS - Twenty-four (7.9%), 54 (17.8%), 186 (61.2%), and 40 (13.2%) patients had LVDD grades of 0, 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Baseline KCCQ-OS was 61.3 ± 22.7, 51.0 ± 26.1, 44.7 ± 25.7, and 44.4 ± 21.9 (p = 0.004) in patients with LVDD grades of 0, 1,2 and 3. At 1 and 12 months after TAVR, LVDD was not associated with KCCQ-OS. Recovery in KCCQ-OS after TAVR was substantial and similar in patients across all severities of LVDD.

 

CONCLUSIONS - Although LVDD is associated with health status prior to TAVR, patients across all severities of LVDD have similar recovery in health status after TAVR.