CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
English

科学研究

科研文章

荐读文献

Safety of six-month dual antiplatelet therapy after second-generation drug-eluting stent implantation: OPTIMA-C Randomised Clinical Trial and OCT Substudy Second-generation drug-eluting stent implantation followed by 6- versus 12-month dual antiplatelet therapy: the SECURITY randomized clinical trial Mechanical circulatory support devices in advanced heart failure: 2020 and beyond Phenotypic Refinement of Heart Failure in a National Biobank Facilitates Genetic Discovery Intravascular ultrasound predictors for edge restenosis after newer generation drug-eluting stent implantation Cost-Effectiveness of Different Durations of Dual-Antiplatelet Use After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Sex Differences in Cardiovascular Pathophysiology: Why Women Are Overrepresented in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction Consensus from the 5th European Bifurcation Club meeting SPECT and PET in ischemic heart failure Timing of intervention in asymptomatic patients with valvular heart disease
|<<... 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 ...>>|

Review ArticleVolume 75, Issue 9, March 2020

JOURNAL：J Am Coll Cardiol. Article Link

Drug-Coated Balloon for De Novo Coronary Artery Disease: JACC State-of-the-Art Review

C Yerasi, BC Case, BJ Forrestal et al. Keywords: CAD; DCB; drug-eluting balloon; paclitaxel-coated balloon; paclitaxel-eluting balloon; small-vessel disease

ABSTRACT

Percutaneous coronary intervention with a drug-eluting stent is the most common mode of revascularization for coronary artery disease. However, restenosis rates remain high. Non-stent-based local drug delivery by a drug-coated balloon (DCB) has been investigated, as it leaves no metallic mesh. A DCB consists of a semicompliant balloon coated with antiproliferative agents encapsulated in a polymer matrix, which is released into the wall after inflation and contact with the intima. DCB have demonstrated effectiveness in treating in-stent restenosis. Clinical studies using DCB in de novo coronary artery disease have shown mixed results, with a major benefit in small-vessel disease. Differences in study results are not only due to variations in DCB technology but also to disparity in procedural approach, “leave nothing behind” or “combination therapy,” and vessel size. This review focuses on the available evidence from randomized trials and proposes a design for future clinical trials.

>CBS CBS 2019

> CBS 2019

> CBS 2019 注册

> CBS 2019 会议日程

> CBS 2019 学术征集

> CBS 2019 热点

 CBSMD

> CBSMD 网站注册

> 教育中心

> 荐读文献

> Top 10 阅读文献

> 文献导读
CBS 2019 CBS 2019 主席团 教育中心 科研动态
Copyright ⓒ CBS MD Nanjing China. All rights reserved. 京ICP备16025898号-11
联系我们| Top