CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
English

科学研究

科研文章

荐读文献

Coronary flow velocity reserve predicts adverse prognosis in women with angina and noobstructive coronary artery disease: resultsfrom the iPOWER study 稳定性冠心病诊断与治疗指南 Mortality 10 Years After Percutaneous or Surgical Revascularization in Patients With Total Coronary Artery Occlusions The spectrum of chronic coronary syndromes: genetics, imaging, and management after PCI and CABG Generalizing Intensive Blood Pressure Treatment to Adults With Diabetes Mellitus Variation in Revascularization Practice and Outcomes in Asymptomatic Stable Ischemic Heart Disease Multivessel Versus Culprit-Vessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Cardiogenic Shock Systems of Care for ST-Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Policy Statement From the American Heart Association Impact of Coronary Lesion Complexity in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: One-Year Outcomes From the Large, Multicentre e-Ultimaster Registry Prevalence of Angina Among Primary Care Patients With Coronary Artery Disease

Review Article2020 May 28.

JOURNAL:Heart Fail Rev. Article Link

The Management of Atrial Fibrillation in Heart Failure: An Expert Panel Consensus

D Farmakis, C Chrysohoou, G Giamouzis et al. Keywords: AF; direct oral anticoagulants; HF; non-vitamin k antagonist oral anticoagulants; rate control; rhythm control

ABSTRACT

Heart failure (HF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) often coexist, being closely interrelated as the one increases the prevalence and incidence and worsens the prognosis of the other. Their frequent coexistence raises several challenges, including under-diagnosis of HF with preserved ejection fraction in AF and of AF in HF, characterization and diagnosis of atrial cardiomyopathy, target and impact of rate control therapy on outcomes, optimal rhythm control strategy in the era of catheter ablation, HF-related thromboembolic risk and management of anticoagulation in patients with comorbidities, such as chronic kidney disease or transient renal function worsening, coronary artery disease or acute coronary syndromes, valvular or structural heart disease interventions and cancer. In the present document, derived by an expert panel meeting, we sought to focus on the above challenging issues, outlining the existing evidence and identifying gaps in knowledge that need to be addressed.