CBS 2019
CBSMD教育中心
English

科学研究

科研文章

荐读文献

Proteomics to Improve Phenotyping in Obese Patients with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients With Left Main and Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: Do We Have the Evidence? Effects of Icosapent Ethyl on Total Ischemic Events: From REDUCE-IT Usefulness of intravascular ultrasound to predict outcomes in short-length lesions treated with drug-eluting stents Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement in Patients with Heart Failure and Secondary Mitral Regurgitation: From COAPT Trial Haptoglobin genotype: a determinant of cardiovascular complication risk in type 1 diabetes Subclinical and Device-Detected Atrial Fibrillation: Pondering the Knowledge Gap: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Long-term outcomes following mini-crush versus culotte stenting for the treatment of unprotected left main disease: insights from the Milan and New-Tokyo (MITO) registry Long-term outcomes with use of intravascular ultrasound for the treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions Baseline Characteristics and Risk Profiles of Participants in the ISCHEMIA Randomized Clinical Trial

Original Research2020 Jun 1;41(21):1988-1999.

JOURNAL:Eur Heart J. Article Link

Simple Electrocardiographic Measures Improve Sudden Arrhythmic Death Prediction in Coronary Disease

NA Chatterjee, JT Tikkanen, PREDETERMINE Investigators et al. Keywords: sudden death; arrhythmic death; electrocardiogram; CHD

ABSTRACT

AIMS -  To determine whether the combination of standard electrocardiographic (ECG) markers reflecting domains of arrhythmic risk improves sudden and/or arrhythmic death (SAD) risk stratification in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD).

 

METHODS AND RESULTS -  The association between ECG markers and SAD was examined in a derivation cohort (PREDETERMINE; N = 5462) with adjustment for clinical risk factors, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and competing risk. Competing outcome models assessed the differential association of ECG markers with SAD and competing mortality. The predictive value of a derived ECG score was then validated (ARTEMIS; N = 1900). In the derivation cohort, the 5-year cumulative incidence of SAD was 1.5% [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1-1.9] and 6.2% (95% CI 4.5-8.3) in those with a low- and high-risk ECG score, respectively (P for Δ < 0.001). A high-risk ECG score was more strongly associated with SAD than non-SAD mortality (adjusted hazard ratios = 2.87 vs. 1.38 respectively; P for Δ = 0.003) and the proportion of deaths due to SAD was greater in the high vs. low risk groups (24.9% vs. 16.5%, P for Δ = 0.03). Similar findings were observed in the validation cohort. The addition of ECG markers to a clinical risk factor model inclusive of LVEF improved indices of discrimination and reclassification in both derivation and validation cohorts, including correct reclassification of 28% of patients in the validation cohort [net reclassification improvement 28 (7-49%), P = 0.009].

 

CONCLUSION -  For patients with CHD, an externally validated ECG score enriched for both absolute and proportional SAD risk and significantly improved risk stratification compared to standard clinical risk factors including LVEF.

 

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION -  https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01114269. ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT01114269.